Almost certainly him, his middle name was Albert.
March 8, 2012 5:54 pm
Is 23:59 the time stamp for when he left, if so what time did he arrive??
I swear this pic makes me think obama was going to grab Bell’s ass.
Baraq was getting a woody!
Y’know when the Obamoid’s ‘legend’ begins to unravel, it is going to be epic
So — this IS getting interesting!
Gee….how will they ever spin this? I bet the records will be scrubbed promptly.
Maybe this guy is his long lost uncle or something.
Americans voted for a commie president, like voting for dancing with the stars, how you say, A Pig in a Poke, or a better one, caveot emptor, really too bad, Lets hope you guys dont make the same mistake again next time. The world’s depending on you
Is the president trying to steal this guys wallet?
White Power = BAD!
Black Power – GOOD!
But both are tribalist group-think. Both are special interest groups created to overwhelm a minority, or in many cases to overwhelm an individual. This is collectivism. This is the core of social science known as ‘Socialism’. This is the ideology that puts a dollar value on human life, then it DE-VALUES THE DOLLAR. (Historical Materialism)
This is what DIRECT Democracy looks like. Its a tyranny of the majority.
Whispering sweet nothing in his ear.
Wonder if Bell got turned down by a white guy, maybe that’s why him and obastard hooked up?
“Well I never liked crackers anyway, I only want dark meat”
Berry is whispering
“Bell that rash is back, ummmm, you might wanna go get checked”
Once you try black, you never go back……..
I’ll tell it to you until I am blue in the face. Pharaoh is coming, Pharao is coming and Pharaoh is coming. Pharaoh was one of the greatest types of anti-Christ in the Book. There are 18 types of anti-Christ (Cain, Pharaoh, Balak, Sisera, Abimelech, Absalom, Saul, Goliath, Ahab, Jeroboam, Nabal, Sennacherib, Nebuchadnezzar, Nimrod, Haman, Solomon, Herod and Judas.) Pharaoh enslaved the Jews and hated them. Adolf Hitler had an ID card in the Austrian Democratic Socialist party and it was 555. The next man in to do what Hitler did (hate Jews, enslave them and kill them like all mentioned above) will be your man. The Bible is a circle. What happened in the OT will happen again. Why do you think Bibi gave O the book of Esther. Now, there are 21 types of Jesus Christ in the Book. Im not going to list them.
Obama and his freinds in low places like so low they would walk beneath a snake
Obama has friends in “down-low” places…
Please jtb, do keep your biblical illiteracy to yourself. Case in point?
The utter ignorance you posted stating that Ham had commited sodomy upon Noah. Shame on you. Ham uncovered his father’s nakedness. Now jtb what does that mean? hint: In Leviticus you will find it, break out your concordance Better stick with the milk first. youngster.
Oh, and Barrack Owebama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure!
Nothing to see according to the left. Much more concerned about Sandra Fluck and her humongous appetite for contraception.
Probably car pooled with Farrakhan and Wright.
Not the same Derrick Bell…. just like it wasn’t the same Rev. Wright the first year the log was reviewed. Yeah.
“Logs Show Derrick Bell Visited White House Twice In 2010…”
They don’t care, they’ll still vote for him. It’s a cult mentality more than a character issue for them.. and they blindly follow. So sad.
Now see, if he could’ve married his true love instead of ‘squatch, he could’ve been Baracka Bell. Sounds quite musical, doesn’t it?
Professor Charles Ogletree has Visited White House 14 Times… just for yucks.
“….Nine of those meetings were directly with Obama; two of those were labeled as holiday receptions and one was a reception for new Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan. One meeting, in August 2010, was with senior adviser Valerie Jarrett…..”
The latest meeting listed with the president is Nov. 9, 2011. The release of appointment information has a lag time of about three months.”
Ogletree: I was joking about Obama video clip
Harvard Law Professor Charles Ogletree told the Herald he was just kidding when he suggested that a decades-old clip of a young Barack Obama praising and embracing controversial Professor Derrick Bell was kept hidden from voters during the 2008 campaign.
“It was a big joke,” Ogletree said. “If you watch the tape, the audience is laughing when I’m laughing.”
This should be played a dozen times a day by the GOP in October…
Another loser for you folks.
I am sure it will not mitigate your hate, but apparently you’re even more dumb than everyone already thought.
“The answer from a White House official: this was not the same Derrick A. Bell. He had a different birthday than the late law professor, whose birthday was November 6, 1930. That would seem to undermine the significance of this visit.
Maybe you should ask for the long-form visitor log … retards
Retards. Thank You. In case you hadn’t yet noticed, we all are looking retarded these days with the way things are going.
But I take it you are of the epitomy of the high road of all things learned?
And….if any of you are smart enough to read the whole article…not just the little words ,you’ll see both times were for a tour.
Not a meeting…a tour.
The Tea Tards will have to find something else to masturbate to, I am afraid.
He had that right.
No other way to describe you folks or the writer of the OP if you all so easily swallowed this lie. Retards.
ATH says: I am sure it will not mitigate your hate,
Look at yourselves in the mirror and see for yourself how you people carry on. Yeah. We get it. So much love that you’re simply dripping with it like sweat?
Your responses tell me that I’m not seeing anything other than hate. Take a good look in the mirror.
Cut the crocodile tears. No respect offered, none expected in return.
But would you like to comment on the lack of an update, or the over-arching fact that the folks on this thread who bought into this lie have no clue what they are talking about, especially ZIP?
You’re all about psychological manipulation, aren’t you?
So, I take it that you’re NOT going to comment on how naive and ignorant ZIP and the rest of the reprobates here are? Just going to go about your business?
What are you seeing on that log that everyone else is not seeing?
Actually, it’s the responsibility of those making the assertion that this was the Bell from Obama’s past to show some facts. Why doesn’t the birthday match? Why was he there with 300 people for a tour, instead of actually meeting with Obama? Read the article, unless you think Jake Tapper is in on the conspiracy too?
Do you have a theory as to whom this Bell may have been, otherwise?
Has the White House provided proof that birth dates didn’t match other than they said so? Am I required to give my DOB on the visitors logs?
I must be really dim witted today, because on that little bitty log thingy on there, I’m not even seeing anything that remotely resembles a DOB.
Why doesn’t the birthday match?
the birthday was never posted
Yeah, the old “It was a different Derrick Bell” who visited routine. I so believe that.
Well, they aren’t going to publish the DOB, but yes, you do have to provide DOB, and probably more than that when visiting the WH Residence. Hell, you have to actually go through your congress-person to even get on the list to take a tour.
So, I guess unless Jake Tapper is in on the conspiracy, you suckers got played!
Well, they aren’t going to publish the DOB,
so how do you know?
How do you know it isn’t? Do you think there is only one Derrick A. Bell in the country?
Quick, contact Jack Tapper, ask him why he is hiding the truth from you!
@ATH, off topic here. So how was it so incredibly easy for that one couple to show up at a WH Ball. Which the news at that time was perplexed wondering how they even got in there. There was no record of them entering or such. Just kind of “poof” there they were.
That we got played? Well, there you have it. If that’s the wording you want to put maybe that was the whole idea of it. To be played. Since there is some of us that expect this potus to provide some of his various absent documents, maybe this was the plan?
About conspiracies. If there never were such a thing as a conspiracy; then why do you suppose the word “conspire” ever came about?
@ATH…. how many of those Derrick Bells would be needing to visit the WH?
Wrong Derrick Bell.
You need to check your facts.
you held it out as the truth, so you lied, no surprise there armless
by the way Tom Morello is a weepy pussy, just like you
Needing? You mean a person named Derrick A. Bell didn’t WANT to take a couple WH tours? So what you’re telling me is that there is a giant conspiracy to change birthdate information, sneak him out of a very secure tour in the WH Residence to meet with Obama, and then lie to media and the public about why a tenured, well respected law professor wasn’t actually there. If they were going to lie about all this crap, why not just change his name? Or not put him on the log in the first place?
You folks are just stretching on this one. Keep trying though, I am sure it will work with the public at large to know scary black professors are skulking around the WH. Two of them, AT LEAST!
Hey trolls, yeah you! Listen up! Get thee back to your D handler and tell them to send over more capable ones. Your poor quality is not commensurate with all the money your boy is raking in.
ATH. You put it all there. If you can hatch up all that thought on it. IF you can come up w/all that nefarious ideas…..
I’m not going to waste anymore time on the subeject. It’s a wasted effort.
So “Truth” are only things which you deem to be facts? Sorry, skippy, you got played like the cheap instrument you are. Sounds like a personal problem, though
Wrong Derrick Bell.
obfuscation doesn’t work
just admit Professor Bell visited the WH, what do you have to hide?
like the cheap instrument
yeah, you and that untalented pussy Morello
Ahh, I see the tin-foil brigade is caught in a tachyon-wave of stupid. Shields Up!
@ATH…to be direct w/you I haven’t put a whole lot of attention on this scene. But for some reasons, compared to other threads this one thread is where you focus your energy. WHY? Is that something of a snare itself?
Who is “skippy”?
Why do you go on like you do? You are so busy preaching to us. How do you get to be that way? You want to entice, antagonize, ensnare, etc.
It was a different Derrick Bell.
He was part of a White House Tour. On both visits. Among 300+ and 282 other people, respectively.
If you have ever been on one of these tours, you are shepherded through rope lines as a crowd, led by a tour guide, to view areas of the WH specifically dedicated for the tour–then out.
This Derrick Bell had an entirely different birthdate than the man you have been speaking of.
Now: The fact that he was on a tour each time, and had a different birth date, means that this was a different person, no matter how much your feverishly driven mind so wishes to believe otherwise.
Antipsychotic medications such as Clozaril are useful in such cases.
Antipsychotic medications such as Clozaril are useful in such cases.
and you know this from your personal psychotic experiences
thanks for sharing
Let’s go with a different Derrick Bell. So big deal. Than what? Now back to the subject of “hate”, do you notice that I haven’t suggested such things to you as your medications needs? You better check about the hate factor.
“Antipsychotic medications such as Clozaril are useful in such cases.” OK. Well, if I ever get psychotic I’ll have the Doctor notified that somebody named “armed the homeless” (or whatever) knew all about it.
But I can tell you this much, If I had to live in your presence on a daily basis I would preferrably choose to become psychotic.
Really. It’s like running in an endless circle.
Derrick Bell in 1994: ‘Jewish Neoconservative Racists’
It might seem nice of Bell to acknowledge the awfulness of anti-Semitism, but he didn’t mean it. The very same interview began as follows: “We should really appreciate the Louis Farrakhans and the Khalid Muhammads while we’ve got them.” Khalid Muhammad was Farrakhan’s right hand, who made a name for himself referring to Jews as, among many other things, “bloodsuckers” whose “father was the devil.” As for Farrakhan, if you need a refresher course in his vileness, look here.
Why exactly were we supposed to appreciate them? Quoth Bell: “While these guys talk a lot, they don’t do anything. The new crop of leaders are going to be a lot more dangerous and radical, and the next phase will probably be led by charismatic individuals, maybe teenagers, who urge that instead of killing each other, they should go out in gangs and kill a whole lot of white people.”
Wrong Derrick Bell so what. O’ has a long list of radical loons parleying with him, all substantiated making the story believable, doesn’t matter he’s the worst president ever foisted on America.
Ok, so now that we have established that ZIP is a filthy liar, and that you are easily duped, we are going to go back to making the case that the President is a scary black radical. I am sure that will help your case. Please.Don’t.Stop.
FYI, the medication recommendation wasn’t from me.
It’s typical to change the subject when one is wrong.
You are wrong.
The idea that Derrick Bell of Harvard University was the visitor in question is false.
The belief is still fervently held, despite fact.
Such belief is known as delusion. Delusions are a symptom of psychotic disorders.
Clozaril is effective for such disorders.
More saliently, wanting to believe that Obama was having meetings with Professor Bell at the White House does not make it so.
It simply says more about the continuing need among some to invent conspiratorial notions about this President.
The fact that you need to continue to invent delusional fantasies about Obama means that you are afraid to contend with his reality.
@noncomposmentis: Are you boldly declaring that Weasel is in need of Clozaril or some such treatments? You feign to actually know how Weasel’s mind operates?
Over egotistical we much?
Hussein worshipped the racist loon, not as if this is a unique instance of him embracing blt nuts. Bell visited his old student in the WH. Own it.
This is where the APA and it’s associates do a great deal of disfavor for our world, in the sense that all is put into the jar of psychoanalysis. And when there arrives the end of times (which many non-believers call it the God Delusion) you’ll notice it states:
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
2 Thess 2:10-12 (KJV)
I’m saying that the fact that there is continued belief in Bell having met with Obama at the White House, despite this being false, falls within the definition of a delusion–a fixed false belief.
Those who are stating this are quite clearly and fervently displaying the operation of their own minds. One only needs to read it.
Not sure what “Over egotistical we much” means, but I’ll run it through the grammar checker.
a delusion–a fixed false belief.
Basically what it boils down to is that any conviction is considered as a false belief. What I take it, is that ANY fixed beliefs are considered delusion.
That’s my response to you separate of what the actual topic/subject is.
No, most fixed beliefs are not false. They simply must be factual–that is, true.
The belief, to be delusional, must be fixed and false.
The sun is in the sky. Fixed, true, non-delusional.
Gravity exists as a force on earth. Fixed, true, non-delusional.
Professor Derrick Bell visited the White House twice during the Obama administration. Fixed, false, delusional.
You just left out that one little part:
It must be true.
However, as we have noted repeatedly w/this Administration is that Truth is not a typical part of their ongoing business. Obfuscation is more the way of operation. Therefore, would it not be possible through deductive reasoning to arrive at such a conclusion on this Bell situation?
At this point I have exhausted the thread. It’s tiresome.
Of course not.
Each fact is dealt with on the merits–just the way the Founding Fathers would have had it.
After all: If the sun is in the sky, that does not mean that the moon is in the earth.
Bell was not there. It is false. Therefore, it cannot be true. Therefore, continuing to believe it is a fixed, false belief.
All the best.
“Almost certainly him, his middle name was Albert.”
The rest of those logs show that Derrick was one of 300 people on a tour, who also have names.
Haven’t yet heard someone suggest the grounds for barring him entry. Let’s just say nothing and wink eh, brother.
Aww, the Zipperheads don’t want to play anymore now that they realize they have been played. Keep it up reprobates, you’re over the target, I swear!
Prattle on trolls
Haven’t yet heard someone suggest the grounds for barring him entry.
there are no grounds to bar race hustlers, I say the more the merrier
leftists will just have to accept it, in fact Sharpton went to the WH too
Obama’s New Partner: Al Sharpton
Malik Zulu Shabazz, national chairman of the radical New Black Panther Party, has visited the White House since President Obama took office
Shabazz’s namesake was among the 110 names and 481 visits released by the White House on Friday as part of the Obama administration’s so-called volunteer disclosure policy.
September 25, 2010
Which ‘Malik Shabazz’ visited the White House?
Anyway, a fitting swan song from Brietbart. What would fit his legacy better than a mundane video which is explosive and outrageous only when you misrepresent it.
I have some secret tapes about Bush/Cheney. About 15hours worth in fact. They’re being hidden away from the public in exactly the same way, available only to me because my web browser has a Flash plug-in for video.
The sad, old white guys really do believe that Malcolm X is hiding under their bed, ready to skin their pretty, alabaster hides. Well, I hate to break it to you, but Malcolm X and Andrew Breitbart are still dead.
Andy Stern of the SEIU, visited the White House numerous times
Andy Stern has openly bragged about the SEIU’s $61 million investment in Barack Obama. It certainly bought him a lot of access.
“Malik Zulu Shabazz, national chairman of the radical New Black Panther Party, has visited the White House since President Obama took office”
Yeah, that was the previous version of this same story.
That if you leave out the part where the logs show a name appearing as 1 of 300 guests on a tour of the White House, you can convince gullible people that this was a secret meeting of importance, rather than the general public checking out the furniture, paintings and desk pens in the east wing.
There’s a search field on the right….
just so many coincidences, and they all took “tours”
Jeremiah Wright, R. Kelly, Michael Jordan, William Ayers, Andy Stern,
Derrick A. Bell, Malik Shabazz, Michael Moore
and then there was Thomas Daschle, Howard Dean, Kim Gandy,
Edward Kennedy, and John Podesta
Did they all take tours or were you again just guessing that because you were too lazy to verify this?
FYI – Either you’re smart enough to realize the name Edward Kennedy and Michael Moore and Michael Jordan and pretty much every other combination of in-use names will appear a significant amount of times in 1.5 million records for a variety of different humans, or you’re not.
Ted Kennedy was also on the no-fly-list for this reason, along with Ted Stevens’ wife. This is either because they were terrorist suspects, or because making conclusions based on non-unique identifiers such as names is flawed.
You’re doing yeoman’s work, but this place is about pretty much just a bunch of sockpuppets and rage junkies. But it sure is fun to watch them flail. Savor the flavor!
speaking of sockpuppets
shamelessly ripping off that pussy Morello, by using his guitars name
yeah, you play alright, with yourself
hey Dutchboy, the union hall needs a fresh coat of paint
“speaking of sockpuppets
shamelessly ripping off that pussy Morello, by using his guitars name
yeah, you play alright, with yourself
hey Dutchboy, the union hall needs a fresh coat of paint”
We were discussing how you can scroll right on an online dataset to see more information. You’re now talking about a guitarist, a laplander and meeting hall.
Did you just have a stroke?
You are a liar. And you know it. Which I guess is the definition of being a liar.
“Almost certainly” adj. phr. “Based on no evidence whatever, this is what I’d like you to believe.”