UNREAL: Obama Says US "Still Working "on Democracy, He's Taking "Historic Steps to Improve Democracy in America" During His Presidency…
Obama hates America, period.
Trackback | RSS 2.0 | Weasel ZippersPresident Obama said Sunday that the United States is still “working on” democracy and a top aide said he has taken “historic steps” to improve democracy in the United States during his time in office.
The remarks came as Obama met with Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev — one of the U.S. president’s many meetings with world leaders ahead of this week’s nuclear summit.
Kazakhstan, which has been touting its record on combating nuclear proliferation, is a key player in the NATO supply network to Afghanistan and currently heads the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
He just keeps talking and talking and the more he talks the more he tanks in the polls so keep talking please you idiot. He knows less about the history of this country than he does about constitutional law which is less than he knows about economics which is less than he knows about nuclear weapons which is less than he knows about foriegn policy which is less than he knows about healthcare. I could go on but you get the point.
Keep it up Obambi and see what you rue
Sarkozy has it right about Obama…. he’s totally looney tunes.
Mr. Kane – you put it so well.
obama keeps working on democracy just like so many liberals and progressives – that’s why they hate our Constitution which explicitly states we are a Republic. If they get enough people to think it is invalid, then they can call off the farce of trying to “inprove the democracy” and get down to the dictatorship they all would love to have instead.
Of course Obama has helped improve democracy in the US! By trying to impose his communist vision of America, he has energized millions of Americans to participate in protests and become actively engaged in the process of rescuing America from his evil clutches.
Excellent point, Proud!
Best “improvement” I can think of is one tested and proven in Iraq – bottle of purple ink at the polling place.
One citizen, one vote…
Not gonna stop ALL the fraud, but it’s a start (and cheap)
Walks on Water is INSANE…he’s proving it daily.
Truly spooky anymore.
I swear, I just keep hoping that once The Messiah’s poll numbers drop low enough, the media will see that it’s a losing battle to continue to prop him up and will then begin to actually REPORT on the constant stream of lies, diversions, and distractions that drop like shit out of O’s mouth. The man truly needs to be publicly embarrassed and taken to task for all this lying.
His ego to his mouth is like what that fluid you drink before a colonoscopy is to your bowels………..pretty soon the only thing left in that knucklehead will be nicotine build up……he keeps draining it of any logic or humility.
Hey Democrats, how much are you going to love this idiot come November?
Like using parliamentary gimmickry to pass bills?
I’m thinking Barack’s definition of “Democracy” and mine are polar opposites.
….has taken historic steps to DISMANTLE democracy would be more like it. The US is a Constitutional Republic but why let silly facts get in the way of ‘Historic Democracy Building’ Why is it that with this guy everything always has to be historic or best ever or first ever….blah blah blah. I have to look for the video but I think just prior to it’s passage, Our Dear Leader called the health care bill the LARGEST deficit reduction bill EVER & also the BIGGEST tax cut ever. Anyone else remember seeing him say that?
Every day, Obama gets up, looks in the mirror, sighs with adulation, and says, “Let’s get to work wrecking this country, you historic, handsome devil!”
Meanwhile, WE should get to work neutralizing Mr. History by putting Conservatives into power this November. EVERY Conservative victory makes it harder for him to implement an agenda.
Here is one (see my last post) it is only about 2 min long and the ‘biggest deficit reduction in over a decade’ is near the end…have your barf bags handy
sorry forgot to post link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMf0Ns_1UGU
He’s going for a “socialist democracy” at best, which requires a complete rebuild of our intended structure. I’d say he is moving along quite well towards that goal. Trouble is, most of us don’t want it. Apparently, he has confused the presidency with a monarchy.
Well the sooner that prick is working on democracy from his retirement home the better.
Latest racism allegations…
http://www.delmarvanow.com/article/20100412/NEWS01/100412033/1002/UMES–Animals-found-hanging-near-dorms
Pet Peeve No. 4875.
WE DO NOT LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY!!!!!
WE DO NOT LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY!!!!!
WE DO NOT LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY!!!!!
WE DO NOT LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY!!!!!
WE DO NOT LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY!!!!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WE LIVE IN A FEDERAL REPUBLIC!!!!
A FEDERAL REPUBLIC!!!!
A FEDERAL REPUBLIC!!!!
A FEDERAL REPUBLIC!!!!
A FEDERAL REPUBLIC!!!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thank you.
I’m feeling much better now.
“improve” and “reform” are Libturd code words for “racist”.
These Demshits and Obama are the most racist people in America.
Obama is a racist. Obama hates white people. Obama married a bigot. Plus, Obama is a religious bigot. Obama hates Jews and Christians.
Wait! Don’t muslims hate Christians and Jews?
Improve democracy… Perhaps we should start asking questions about the big picture…
Do we need a Referendum For A New Democracy?
Are you concerned about the future of democracy? Do you feel democracy is under attack by extreme greed in countries around the world? Are you sick and tired of: living in fear, corporate greed, growing police state, government for the rich, working more but having less?
Can we use both elections and random selection (in the way we select government officials) to rid democracy of undue influence by extreme wealth and wealth-dominated mass media campaigns?
The world’s first democracy (Athenian democracy, 600 B.C.) used both elections and random selection. Even Aristotle (the cofounder of Western thought) promoted the use of random selection as the best way to protect democracy. The idea of randomly selecting (after screening) juries remains from Athenian democracy, but not randomly selecting (after screening) government officials. Why is it used only for individual justice and not also for social justice? Who wins from that? …the extremely wealthy?
What is the best way to combine elections and random selection to protect democracy in today’s world? Can we use elections as the way to screen candidates, and random selection as the way to do the final selection? Who wins from that? …the people?
democracy is racist