Canada: Ontario to Teach Sixth-Graders About "Anal Intercourse" . . . Amazingly, People Have a Problem With This…
With guest teacher, Bawney Fwank. . .
Trackback | RSS 2.0 | Weasel ZippersThe days of euphemisms and innuendo in Ontario’s classrooms are numbered, with the province set to roll out a new sex education curriculum next fall built on clear and explicit language that has raised objections from conservative parent groups.
The revision, outlined in 208 pages that were quietly posted on the Ministry of Education’s website in January, will for the first time teach Grade 3 pupils about such topics as sexual identity and orientation, and introduce terms like “anal intercourse” and “vaginal lubrication” to children in Grades 6 and 7. The new curriculum begins in Grade 1 with lessons about the proper names of body parts.
The changes came to light Tuesday, when members of a religious, “family-focused” coalition threatened to pull their children out of school on May 10 unless Premier Dalton McGuinty abandons the changes.
The Premier stood by the curriculum, saying he has confidence in the judgment of school principals and teachers to present the information in a thoughtful and responsible manner. If sex education is not taught in the classroom, he added, students could get information from potentially uninformed sources, such as their friends.
What ever happened to reading, writing, ‘rithmetic?
What do elementary students know or care about sex? Jesus, what the hell is wrong with these people who think this shit up? Fire them all and put in real educators instead of these deviants? What next? field trips to a strip joint or gay bar?
“If sex education is not taught in the classroom, he added, students could get information from potentially uninformed sources, such as their friends.”
Or their parent????????
Ridiculous,with all the info,good and not so good, floating around the internet why would a naturally curious kid even listen to what some dopey teacher has to say on the topic. Just another excuse for the lefturds to social engineer and quite frankly indulge their perverted fantasies.
Yes, we are all baffled why our Premier, Dalton McGuinty, a self-professed Catholic, appears so vacuous whenever he speaks, and why the local diocese has not even considered refusing him communion. Why teach homosexual practices (speaking of the anal intercourse – read “SODOMY”) to pre-pubescent children unless you are trying to promote the behaviour? Very disturbing. He will not be getting my vote, let me tell you.
And yes, our education system is falling behind (no pun intended).
No one is more “informed” than a horny teacher thinking about anal sex and 11 year olds.
Maybe Canada can borrow our “safe” schools czar for this?
Wonder how the Muslim ∂re going to feel ∂bout this?
Most child molesters are liberals/democrats and there are many of them in the teaching profession in Canada and the U.S. but the mainstream media sweeps it under the rug instaed of making it a top story as they do with the Catholic church. These perverts are just preparing your children for the day they begin molesting them.
Freakin stupid canadians. They’ll never change. Outlaw the Bible and teach sodomy to first graders…
The sooner they get taught sex-ed, the sooner they’ll find out how they’re getting fudge-packed by the leftist politicos.
In Canada back in 1979, I remember being horrified when myself and the other 11 yr. old females in class had to go to a mother daughter night to learn about Menstruation. Where the hell does anal sex fit into the natural evolution of the human body????? Good God!!?? This is obviously a liberal/gay rights agenda to make it an accepted concept free of moral persecution. There is absolutely no need for this to be taught in schools. I can only hope that people with school age children are protesting this loudly….then again Canadians have always been apathetic to speaking out. We just complain in our houses and hope someone can hear us.
@greg:
We are not “freakin stupid”, nor has the Bible been outlawed in Canada. .
And when it comes to liberal sex ed, it seems the USA is leading the way:
From The Washington Times:
The Obama administration is stonewalling serious inquiries about sexual filth propagated by a senior presidential appointee who is responsible for promoting and implementing federal education policy. This scandal, however, is not merely about homosexual behavior; it is about promoting sex between children and adults – and it’s time for President Obama to make clear that abetting such illegal perversion has no place in his administration.
It is curious why White House officials and Education Secretary Arne Duncan believe it’s worth it politically to continue taking arrows for defending Kevin Jennings, who is Mr. Obama’s controversial “safe schools czar.” The evidence suggesting he is unfit to serve as a senior presidential appointee is startling and plentiful. It was revealed this week that Mr. Jennings was involved in promoting a reading list for children 13 years old or older that made the most explicit sex between children and adults seem normal and acceptable. This brought up anew Mr. Jennings’ past controversies, such as his seeming encouragement of sex between one of his high school students and a much older man as well as his praise for Harry Hay, a notorious supporter of the North American Man Boy Love Association.
But there is more. There are shocking new revelations this week of tape recordings from a youth conference involving 14-year-old students. The conference, billed as a forum to encourage tolerance of homosexuality, was sponsored by Mr. Jennings’ organization and was held at Tufts University in March 2000. Mr. Jennings was executive director of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) from its founding in 1995 until August 2008. The conference sessions appear to have had less to do with promoting tolerance and more to do with teaching children how to engage in sex.
Andrew Breitbart’s Biggovernment.com provides tapes of some of the sessions. Describing the subject matter as smut would be putting it lightly. The conference discussions were very graphic and cannot be relayed in full detail in a family newspaper. A few examples are sufficient to describe the depravity of the subject matter. During one session about oral sex, a presenter asked the 14-year-old students: “Spit or swallow? Is it rude?” In another session, the 14-year-olds are taught about a gross practice called “fisting,” in which “the man leading the discussion position[ed] his hand and show[ed] 14-year-olds how to insert their entire hand into the rectum of their sex partner.”
Teaching children sexual techniques is simply not appropriate. Unfortunately, it is part of a consistent pattern by some homosexual activists to promote underage homosexuality while pretending that their mission is simply to promote tolerance for so-called alternative lifestyles. It is outrageous that someone involved in this scandal is being paid by the taxpayers to serve in a high-powered position at the Education Department, of all places. At some point, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Jennings, Obama administration spokesmen and the president himself are going to have to start answering questions about all this. Refusing to do so won’t make the issue go away.
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC
Good LORD – whether it is Canada or the USA – it is the same freakin’ crowd pushing this filth. I think separating the two is a mistake in this kind of social re-engineering issue – it is happening throughout the Western world – just a different levels. At ANY level it is obscene.
“students could get information from potentially uninformed sources,”
Or Bill Clinton..
Time for a Human Rights Complaint
I’m thinking kids would be better off getting information from potentially uninformed sources like friends. It couldn’t be as bad as what they will be taught in school. How pathetic! Mine graduate (from private school) in another year and then I can start worrying about what they pick up in college. Any suggestions for a conservative one?
I feel sorry for anyone with a child in the public school. This is tantamount to abuse.
McGuinty caved. ….for now. http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=2939289
beyond fucking beleif
Update:
Due to protests from parents, the Ontario government is taking another look at this proposed education legislation. It’s not a done deal, yet.