Herman Cain: “Anybody Who Takes the Oath of Office in My Administration Will Put Their Hand on the Bible, Not the Koran”…
Ding. . . ding. . . ding — round 3!
Via Shark Tank:
I don’t know one Muslim who will denounce Sharia Law, and then say they can support the Constitution of the United States of America. So my assumption based on what I know about their belief system is that they are not going to give up Sharia Law. Anybody that takes the oath of office in a Herman Cain administration will put their hand on the Bible, not the Koran!
HT: Right Scoop
Round 1: Herman Cain: “I Would Not” Appoint A Muslim In My Administration
Posted by ZIP on Thursday, March 31, 2011, at 1:08 pm | 
Tweet
He’s got my vote.
What would people have to put their hand on if Bawney got elected?
I love this guy…the primaries are going to be so much fun…can’t wait.
i have listened to mr. cain’s radio show and he is the real deal, a strong, intelligent man with business experience and a belief that we can again lead the world, but it will take some hard work and realistic thinking to get there. i’m glad he said what he did, he merely stated what should be obvious to all Americans. now we get to sit back and watch the left’s heads explode with rage at his “insensititivy” toward our poor, oppressed, misunderstood muslim brothers. get real, people, the muslims are here to blow our asses back to the 13th century, and if i have anything to say about it, it ain’t gonna happen. cain/west or west/cain, at this time in our history it is a no-brainer.
Finally. AMERICANS coming out in the open. AMERICANS running for President. Trump, Cain, Palin. AMERICANS they aren’t wishy washy PC morons, and aren’t afraid to state the truth about moslims and the USURPER.
West, Rubio, and others also, but they won’t run.
Herman Cain just keeps getting more and more awesome.
Fuck president, this redneck whats to make him the KING.
WHAT THE F*#K ( OVER )
THis is the “bring it on” candidate. What say ye of Cain/West for 2012?
Hening says:
What would people have to put their hand on if Bawney got elected?
haha Do you HAVE to ask?!!
More Herman:
http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2011/03/31/herman-cain-dismantles-president-obamas-foreign-policy/
Love this Guy! And why someone would put his hand into a pile of vomit, shit and insanity written by Psycopaths Fool’s Murderer.
Palin/Cain/West
Any combo of those 3 is fine with me
Wow, this would be such a great match up in the liberal game of race cards, can you imagine what CNN and MSNBC would do, melt down! You should read some of the black liberal activist blogs regarding Herman, he drives them nuts!
They just don’t get it…oh well, who cares?
The United States is not a Christian nation. It is a nation full of Christians. This Cain guy is spitting on the Constitution with this drivel.
Rupaula, nice try troll.
Cain/West, or West/Cain 2012
Finally someone who says what he means…..a TRUE American!!! Let’s schedule a debate between him and Obama!!
Reminds me of the days when you could tell the good guys from the bad guys, don’t get wobbly and back down Herman Cain and you just might have a chance!
Rupaula…
http://www.themoralliberal.com/2011/03/29/wilders-is-right-ban-muslim-immigration-building-of-mosques/
the First Amendment does not explicitly protect the Islamic faith, nor does it prohibit it. The First Amendment is simply silent about the issue of Islam.
Thus Islam should enjoy only the liberty it merits, and permission, for example, to build new mosques can be revoked if Islam does in American what Islam does everywhere it exists in the world, which is labor to subvert democracy and impose sharia law.
This view of the First Amendment is confirmed by a review of the debate surrounding the First Amendment in Congress in 1789. A re-reading of the all the entries in the congressional record of the debate over the First Amendment reveals no mention — zero, nada, zilch — of Islam.
Instead, as the Founders grappled with the wording of the First Amendment, they road-tested several variations, all of which make it clear that the objective here was specifically to protect the free exercise of the Christian faith.
Here are some of the alternative versions that were considered:
* “Congress shall make no law establishing One Religious Sect or Society in preference to others.”
* “Congress shall not make any law, infringing the rights of conscience or establishing any Religious Sect or Society.”
* “Congress shall make no law establishing any particular denomination of religion in preference to another, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, nor shall the rights of conscience be infringed.”
* “Congress shall make no law establishing articles of faith, or a mode of worship, or prohibiting the free exercise of religion.”
* “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”
===========================
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2003/01/news-feed-20110330.html
from Gates of Vienna News feed… all you zipperheads should read it every day..
this is just too good, last time around fred thompson was saying all the right things and then he dissapeared and we were left with john mc rino. if we end up with huckabee im gonna put a gun in my mouth.
@Van Grungy,
The first rule of contract interpretation is the words used. None of those words are Christian specific. Nice try though.
I love this guy.
Rupaula- You are too stupid to even realize you just got schooled.
He’s going to have appeal to people tired of the PC BS that goes on today. Schmucks in congress won’t know how to deal with him.
@Monster Zero,
You’re joking right? His proof of the First Amendment only applying to Christianity is that the Founding Fathers debated using a number of different wordings, none of which specifically reference “Christianity.”
You would think that when forming a nation, if they meant to only protect the freedom to worship as a Christian, they would have said that or at least had it one of the drafts.
@Rootpuller
“The United States is not a Christian nation. It is a nation full of Christians. This Cain guy is spitting on the Constitution with this drivel.”
They teach that shit at Berkley?
I can’t say I actually read the koran. The book I read was printed in English. However, my understanding of the moose-limb dementia is that they could say whatever words or phrases happen to come out of their mouth. Five seconds later, they could claim it was all a lie, whether it was a lie or not. Six seconds later, they could claim it as the hermaphrodite moon she god’s will and whatever sounds you may claim to have heard are totally in your head. (btw that would include whatever recordings you have).
The part that absolutely makes me laugh when I see it on video is how the next day (or even DECADES later) some “shaman/sheepherder/longerbeardthanyours/pedophile” says everything that was said back then was crap and proceeds to tell everybody what it really meant.
Then I stop laughing long enough to catch my breath and notice that all the other moose-limb are just fine with everything that happened.
Of course I’m insane because I think every last one of them is demented.
Rupaula you’re an AUTHENTIC DUMBASS a Pure ONE, a Real ONE……pisslam is not a religion, it’s a DEMENTED IDEOLOGY, do you understand that?…NO! you can’t ?….too much Dumbass…..Sorry we can do nothing for you, we cant help you.
My grandparents had to flee Northern Ireland after death threats because of conflicts between Catholics and Protestants. She was Protestant, and he was Catholic. When I became of age, I volunteered and joined the Army, and I served as an 11B Infantryman. Most of my time in the field was in squad or platoon size operations. We would have discussions about what we were fighting for. It always came back to the “Bill of Rights”. To me the most important was “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”.
What else did our Founding Fathers have to say about religion?
“Question with boldness even the existence of a god.” – Thomas Jefferson (letter to Peter Carr, 10 August 1787):
“All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.” Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason;
“Religion and government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together”, John Madison.
“Lighthouses are more helpful than Churches”, Benjamin Franklin.
We don’t have freedom of religion. If we did, David Koresh would still be alive. He was labeled a threat and eliminated. We should do the same with any mosque that is radicalized.