Bill Clinton Wants US or UN to Create Internet Truth Agency…
Full blown crazy.
(Politico) — Bill Clinton doesn’t like all the misinformation and rumors floating on the Internet. And he thinks the United Nations or the U.S. government should create an agency to do something about it.
“It would be a legitimate thing to do,” Clinton said in an interview airing Friday on CNBC.
The agency, Clinton said, would “have to be totally transparent about where the money came from” and would have to be “independent” because “if it’s a government agency in a traditional sense, it would have no credibility whatever, particularly with a lot of the people who are most active on the internet.”
Posted by ZIP on Saturday, May 14, 2011, at 2:16 pm | 
Tweet
The Ministry of Truth? Now let me see, where have I heard that one before?
“Bill Clinton doesn’t like all the misinformation and rumors floating on the Internet.”
Misinformation and rumors wouldn’t be all about shutting out veritas and Republicans would it? Why of course it would.
FU Billy the lech.
He inhaled this time. Never blog drunk and never give a speech when you’re high.
Democrats – Making government bigger, to best manage your life.
Stupid and dangerous.
Or, maybe he didn’t say it? HMMM?
Maybe he didn’t have sex with that woman…
stfu you old drain bamaged commie fool.A ministry of propaganda already exists,its called the mfm. The only misinformation we are bombarded with comes from those 30 plus “news” affiliates controlled by your pal Soros.
Let it all hang out Billy Jeff.
Call it Pravda.
These liberals are desperate to censor anyone that doesn’t agree with them.
Yea, Soros and Friends, will get right on that.
“it would have no credibility whatever, particularly with a lot of the people who are most active on the internet.” Looks like you just answered your own question, Bill.
Administered by Cass Sunstien, no doubt?
Would “the truth” be determined by “scientific consensus”?
.
Bill Clinton an advocate for the truth… LOL go figure!
That’s a great idea BJ Bill can we start with the truth from you and Hill about Whitewater and then we can go into the sexual relations that did happen in the oval office.
How about obama not being a natural born citizen but Congress covered it up and let him become president?
The Government running a truth department. I can’t see how this would become a bad thing and turn into some sort of Nazi department.
The Government and truth the biggest joke in all the land.
Please someone locked these progressives u, I have had just about all I can take from them.
Yeah, we can’t have anything but the Party line out there now, can we? Just how stupid do they think we are?
Can you imagine if a Republican floated this idea?
Yeah, it would be need to be run by someone “independent” with no ties whatsoever to the government. George Soros, perhaps?
……………….
And so….Slick Willie Cumstains wants us to believe that he cares about the Truth?
Am I the only one who sees the epic hypocrisy of this?
Of all the people on the planet to be calling for an ‘Internet Truth Agency’…..this is the last person who should even be bringing up the subject of ‘truth’.
They are intoxicated by their own stupidity and thank you 42% who handed them the keys. What a fustercluck that specimens such as these are destroying our country.
Clinton the one-celled organism wouldn’t find or know the truth if it were clamped down on his wanker! STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Worser still, 52%
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/05/12/unprecedented-obama-admin-claims-it-can-censor-unclassified-materials/
Scarier and scarier
To be implemented and run by Media Matters of course
Sounds like something Soros is whispering in Billy’s ear… naturally everything on the internet about Israel will be absolutely true, including everything about islam too.
LMAO…this coming from one of the King of Liars, ex-Impeached Prez of the USA.
One thing about it…Obama’s right in line with him…if not exceeding Clintoon at lying.
The sh*t that comes out of their mouths, wow. Stuff they would not dare publicly utter a few short years ago. Their black Jesus™ has emboldened their inner commie.
can you say Vince Foster ?
Who’s truth?
this communist,lying,POS. Soros bastard son. I can’t figure for the life of me why he is still walking this earth as a free man. Don’t get me started. Justice is coming for Clinton’s and all their little friends too.
LOL – the perjurer is worried about truth on the Internet.
*Spit*
Why won’t this shit sack and his equally shitty wife go away?
GO AWAY.
No one wants to hear a single word out of your lying, ho mongering, corrupt mouth.
The truth, updated and corrected daily. ref osama
Bill Clinton and Truth in the same sentence? That’s got to be a joke!
Maybe we’re not listing to this in the context in which it was intended. Our comprehension is essential to our understanding, is it not?
This whole thing depends on what the definition of “is” is.
.
Most of the misinformation and rumors circulating on the internet come directly from Obama.
You can’t handle the truth, you PUTZ!
Go play with Jimmy Carter’s peepee.
The internet is kicking the liberals butts. Too late now, Bill. The cat is out the bag!
We can’t have people out there just talking about whatever they want, after all.
this from the man who was caught perjuring himself? ROFLMAO!
It just amazes me the South could produce a pile of political shit like this . Get off the stage liar .
THIS LIEING COMMIE SCUM doesn’t even know the meaning of the word truth or even the definition of is is
So a total of (2) United States presidents have been impeached and one of them is lecturing that telling the truth is important? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. He is fucking joking right? hahahahahahahahaha. Bill Clinton you are straight up one funny motherfucker…. I mean intern fucker. heh
PC Czar killing me..
I like the net just like it is. Dangerous and free. Soon as they get to regulate, they get to tax, censor, apply various user fees.. possibly license every user, and site… who knows. All it will take is a single crack in the wall and it is over.
BILL SPENT WAY TOO MUCH TIME AT THE GRAMSCI INSTITUTE. WAIT, WE’RE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW THAT.
What would Bill Clinton know about truth and transparency?
I guess it depends upon the meaning of transparency…smoked dope but didn’t inhale, never had sexual relations with that woman, I love Hillary, Barry will win 2012….etc., etc., etc. and that was just the shit that didn’t really matter.
If you look at that picture and imagine a gun instead of his finger with Willy saying “If I’m lying I’m dying”!
Some serious brain damage going on there. This coke-head, gash hound is just as stupid as he looks. I’m still in disbelief this worthless lump of shit was a two-term president. Just goes to show, you can fool 42% of the people all the time.
“The Senators Who Say Merely Linking To Certain Sites Should Be A Felony
I wrote earlier about how the new PROTECT IP Act guts parts of the DMCA, but as you dig deeper, it’s looking even worse. The original (and now updated) article focused on the use of the term “interactive computer service,” which was in a draft copy of the bill. At the last minute, that was changed instead to be “information location tool.” While, at first, this may seem to be a narrower definition, there are some serious concerns that this effectively makes it illegal to link to any website that is accused of being “dedicated to infringing purposes.” That’s because an “information location tool” is defined under current law to be: a “directory, index, reference, pointer, or hypertext link.”
Yes, you read that correctly: a link is an “information location tool” and such tools may be barred from pointing to sites deemed “dedicated to infringing” purposes. That seems like a massive breach of the First Amendment. If there is relevant information, as someone covering the news, why should I be prevented from linking?
Making matters even worse is a companion bill introduced by Senators Amy Klobuchar, John Cornyn and Christopher Coons, which would ratchet up charges for sites that stream infringing works to a felony. The specific text of the bill is not yet public, and it’s likely that it just extends the “public performance” rights to section 506a of the Copyright Act (which only covers distribution and reproduction rights today). But, that leaves open a huge question of what is considered a “public performance” and how you define “streaming” in relation to a public performance. I can see it reasonably applying to a site hosting the content and streaming it… but what about an embed or a link, in which the content never touches the site in question at all? Tragically, we’ve already seen that the feds consider merely linking or embedding to be a form of a felony — so it appears this bill is designed to make that even clearer, and that is really dangerous.
Put it all together, and our elected officials are now claiming that linking to something can be a felony. Yeah. Scary.
It seems that we really should highlight the list of Senators who have sponsored these bills, and who are telling you that linking to content should be considered a felony. The first bill is sponsored by:
Patrick Leahy
Orrin Hatch
Chuck Grassley
Charles Schumer
Dianne Feinstein
Sheldon Whitehouse
Lindsey Graham
Herb Kohl
Chris Coons
Richard Blumenthal
Al Franken <– Updated to include, missed him on the first pass
The latter bill is
Amy Klobuchar
John Cornyn
Chris Coons, who has the distinction of sponsoring both dreadful bills
So, there you go. The Senators who think it's okay for the government to put people in jail for linking."
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110513/11210514265/senators-who-say-merely-linking-to-certain-sites-should-be-felony.shtml
Congressman John Dingell:
"It takes a long time to do the necessary administrative steps that have to be taken to put the legislation together to control the people."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nk_HPs34usU
Thanks, Blue Sky.
Great info, as usual. I saved that info.
No credibility, like Bill Clinton’s governance. Every time you run your mouth you are only digging your hole deeper Billy and the day gets closer every minute.
“If it’s a government agency in the traditional sense”???????
Is there any other kind?
Tantamount to book burning…..what the “progressive socialists” don’t want you to know or think, will be declared a lie.
These liberal assholes just LOVED the internet a few short years ago, when Obama’s digital “mobilization and information” push was on, now the beast has turned on them, and the bastards are rushing to find a way to shut it down before they’re kicked the hell out of office by the same monster they helped create…I got news for you, Dems, the genie’s out of the bottle, and no amount of legislative crap you come up with will put it back…we will find our way to the truth…”viva la digital revolucion”….ha!…..
Billie hears Karl and Adolph in his head, but only on Tuesdays.
“The agency, Clinton said, would “have to be totally transparent about where the money came from” and would have to be “independent” because “if it’s a government agency in a traditional sense…”
What Slick is alluding to here is the formation of an NGO (Non-Governmental Organization).
(Plenty of non-profit NGO’s receive money handed to them from the government. One of my neighbors worked for such an NGO, called the Free Iraq Foundation, which has received funds from the State Department.)
“According to the group’s 2002 IRS Form 990, Free Iraq Foundation, Inc. received $1.66 million in support for 2001, 99.97 percent of that figure coming from public funding sources. In 2000, the group’s income was $1 million. For 1998 and 1999, $265,000 and $580,000 respectively.
“The Iraqi-American National Network (IANN) is a project sponsored by the Free Iraq Foundation.”
The Muslim Students Association helped developed the Free Iraq Foundation.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Iraq_Foundation
From back in Dec, 2005:
Who Will Control the Internet?
“Foreign governments want control of the Internet transferred from an American NGO to an international institution. Washington has responded with a Monroe Doctrine for our times, setting the stage for further controversy.”
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/61192/kenneth-neil-cukier/who-will-control-the-internet
@Larry7 (prev. just Larry)
You’re most welcome, Lar, and too kind.
I always appreciate your generous words.
Conservative men rock.
commieobamie says:
May 15, 2011 at 11:40 am
Billie hears Karl and Adolph in his head, but only on Tuesdays.
_________
LOL!
BlueSky, I saved the info in your next post, too! Thanks again!
The guy is looking very old and early senility
is clearing setting in. Payback for this rapist
white trash used up con artist.