San Francisco Lib Nanny Staters Consider Banning The Sale Of All Pets…
We really should be thanking San Francisco for showing the rest of the country what America would look like if we handed the keys over to the left.
Comments & pings are closed.SAN FRANCISCO — The first vision was simple and straightforward: To curtail puppy mills and kitten factories, the sale of cats and dogs should be banned in San Francisco, where the loving guardians of animal companions come to regular blows — politically — with the loving parents of children.
The ban was put on hold last year after animal advocates broadened it to include anything with fur or feathers. Now it’s back, with a new name and a new strategy: More is more. The Humane Pet Acquisition Proposal is on its way to the Board of Supervisors, and it hopes to protect everything from Great Danes to goldfish.
Yes, goldfish. And guppies, gobies, gouramies, glowlight tetras, German blue rams. No fish, no fowl, no reptiles, no amphibians, no cats, no dogs, no gerbils, no rats. If it flies, crawls, runs, swims or slithers, you would not be able to buy it in the city named for the patron saint of animals.
“Why fish? Why not fish?” said Philip Gerrie, a member of the city’s Commission of Animal Control and Welfare and a co-author of the proposal. “From Descartes on up, in the Western mindset, fish and other nonhuman animals don’t have feelings, they don’t have emotions, we can do whatever we want to them. If we considered them living beings, we would deal with them differently. . . . Our culture sanctions this, treating them as commodities and expendable.”






San Francisco Nazi Pet Kitchen….”No Pets For You”
Also in the news, San Francisco bans the intake of oxygen and the exhust of carbon dioxide for all who live in the city….film at eleven….
On the up side of this, if it gets to the point there are no animals in San Francisco I can stop feeling guilty for wishing the place would get blown off the map.
Guess the boi’s in SF will have to drive to Sacramento to buy their gerbils
Are gerbils considered ‘pets’ or ‘life-partners’?
Ya know, if we’re banning human behaviors…….
San Francisco also REQUIRES composting! Visualize your compost pit in the kitchen of your 9th floor apartment. Once a week you can put it out on the curb for pick up. I am not making this up……….
“Why fish? Why not fish?” said Philip Gerrie, a member of the city’s Commission of Animal Control and Welfare and a co-author of the proposal. “From Descartes on up, in the Western mindset, fish and other nonhuman animals don’t have feelings, they don’t have emotions, we can do whatever we want to them. If we considered them living beings, we would deal with them differently. … Our culture sanctions this, treating them as commodities and expendable.”
But unborn babies? Kill ‘em.
Good grief!
Next to close in SF . . . their zoo? Bet it is next on their agenda. Pretty soon there will be very little reason to visit the place. Besides, it is cold there until almost July.
“But unborn babies? Kill ‘em.”
———
Yeah!
“Save the baby whales!” …… “Kill the baby humans!”
The demand a natural existence for everything but the human animal. They believe that every human behavior should be closely managed by an omnipotent central planner.
What socialists are building is their idea of the “ideal natural habitat” for humans. The elite liberals are the zoo keepers.
.
Shut down the entire city, its one big sideshow.
Who needs pets?
They’ve got each other on leashes with collars…
plus, they’ve perfected Doggies’ Style.
Build a fence around San Francisco. You can go there but no one gets out. Contaminated area.
Dang @gastorgrab you beat me to the line………..I’m sure Gerbils will be considered “life partners” and will be given the rights of all humans…….
No pun intended but the camel has his nose in the tent.
The next thing for San Fran is total vegitarian.
No sales of any knd of meat, fish or poultry –
Then one of these nimrods is going to ask if the vine feels pain when the tomato is plucked or if the hazelnut is traumatized when it’s shell is cracked.
Seriously people we all thought back in the day”oh look at the hippie….he’s all about peace and love”…..I’m here to tell you those drugs seriously rotted their brains. If you were one of those that thought drugs were a government plot gone wrong…….Sickfrisco is the shiney example on the hill…………..
Black market tropical fish. I smell a lucrative opportunity here. Iz gots two carassius auratus that just fell off a truck. Make me an offer.
All goes toward setting precedent. Cass Sunstein’s plan for giving animals “human” rights.
No more killing animals for food. Farmers being sued by their animals, who of course, are given attorneys by the government.
Just wait for it….
Gastor and Pagan…LMAO!
I have never heard of anyone taking a goldfish to the animal shelter. Did I read that right?
As long as they are banning unhealthy and “inhumane” behavior, perhaps they should get around to banning male anal intercourse, which is about as unhealthy an act there is. While there at it, they should refuse to use tax dollars to treat homosexual AIDS patients.
Here is the pinnacle of outlandish behavior taken to the extreme by people who think they rule the world. I believe it is the result of the flood of drugs they have all taken out there over the years. Look what it did to Nancy Pelosi !!!!!!!!
All Frisco is good for or ever has been good for is a place to film “Bullit” & “Dirty Harry” movies. There is nothing there but the dregs of human de-evolution . Its solid proof that people with degenerative mental ailments are all Liberals !!!!!!!
Threw the car keys to my companion animal and told him he was driving me to work today and to get gas on the way back home, acted like he didn’t get it, ended up having to drive myself. When I got home this afternoon he was over by the aquarium and it got suspiciously quiet when I asked what the hell they were ‘cooking’ up. This seemed to upset the Oscar and I’m pretty sure it’s pouting now. Am I just insensitive?
does that mean I have to give up my pet mexican?
Anything that gets people away from buying animals at pet stores is a good thing, I think…so will adopting animals from HSUS, SPCA, etc. still be allowed?
You have to understand something here in SF. The people are starting to notice all this progressive stuff happening. The progressives have taken over the board in SF. Generally, people are actually not happy about here about this progressive rot that has taken over the city. Don’t cross off SF yet.
And to all the gay bashing/jokes on here…I know your comments are suppose to be funny, and in a sick sense they are, but some of you really do exhibit a lot hate and intolerance. It just makes me sad that people here mimick the hate and intolerance from the left. Aren’t we better than that??
San Francisco the all time stupid city of total idiots and jerks the whole place needs to fall into the ocean and take those darn bridges with it
OxyCon says:
June 27, 2011 at 2:42 pm
As long as they are banning unhealthy and “inhumane” behavior, perhaps they should get around to banning male anal intercourse, which is about as unhealthy an act there is. While there at it, they should refuse to use tax dollars to treat homosexual AIDS patients.
How about straight AIDS patients? That is humane and ok? But not the gay ones? OxyContin is one sick mind .
Um, I think you’ll notice that SF is looking a just BANNING pets. period.
This is no suprise to anyone who has been PAYING ATTENTION to PETA and all the other “animal rights” wackos. Their endgame is the *extinction* of domestic animals (yes, including our tasty meat animals– cattle, chickens, piggies, ducks, etc.).
Shelters are supposed to become simply euthanasia factories (led by PETA’s “shelter” which has a kill rate of around 97%). In liberal strongholds, it is often more work to get a shelter cat or dog than you’d think. (I’ve had friends turned down for a shelter pet due to “home not big enough” or “pet already present in home”– BS excuses.) And because spay/neuter programs are WORKING!!!, more and more domestic mix cats & dogs are coming up with genetic defects usually only found in breeds with small genepools.
Add to this the fact that vet. schools are turning out grads who are openly hostile to reputable breeders and are in fact astoundingly ignorant of reproductive issues… well, you get the picture.
Sadly, PETA/AR seem to be winning on many fronts, although the “limit laws” they tried pushing in the late 90s/early 00s have turned out to be uninforceable or easy to get around.
SF is a proving ground for what these crunchy nuts want for the rest of us…
Remember that movie, “Escape from New York”? Maybe we ought to have a real life version in San Francisco.
If they really banned all pets then the city would be a ghost town.
Oh, riiight, gibsmedats aren’t pets, they’re voters!
The inmates long ago took over the asylum–our only hope is that “Big One” will arrive soon and the whole west coast will quietly slip into the sea.
We should pray all the sane ones wake up move to Texas, Florida, etc. before then.
@PalinPatriot-I don’t feel any worse wishing bad on the progressive assholes of San Francisco than I would feel if I caught some thug breaking into my house if I put a bullet in his brains. It’s all the same to me. And no, I for one am sick of being told that I should be “better than that”. I put that on the same level as soldiers going off to fight a war with the proverbial one arm tied behind their backs, usually due to the political correctness of Democrat and RINO Republican politicians. You should show no mercy to these scumbags, because you can damn sure expect no mercy from them. That’s just the way it is.
Ban the north american pavement ape from San Francisco and I will care.
They’re not pets, they’re human companions.
You’re not a pet owner, you’re a pet parent.
…at least according to this dipsh*t commercial for dog food I just saw.
A special last minute exemption from the SF city officials will be granted for shops that handle the sales of single use, shaved gerbils.
Work in an animal shelter for a time and you’ll realize why some people should not be allowed to take responsibility for a house plant, let alone a pet or child.
Now that I have said that, banning the sale of all pets is a knee-jerk reaction typical of the do-gooders on the left. They don’t see the hypocrisy in getting all wee-wee’d up about the sale of a goldfish but can’t see a problem with smashing the head of an unborn child so it will pass through a cervix on it’s way to a bio hazard trash can.
It’s all about control my friends, as I sit here with two birds on my head and a 14 year old giant green iguana on my lap.
In other words, if it flies, swims crawls or slithers the only place in San Francisco where you can find it will be on the menu of a Chinese restaurant.
liberals equals control. control every aspect of your life including pets. Just like muslimes they have no boundary they will not cross to control people. The abortion is similiar issue of destroying family strucures as a way of creating disharmony within society and then control. These people talk of freedom and choice but cause the very opposite. In fact there is little if any difference between muslimes and liberals- they hate everything. I believe now they actually hate themselves on a deeper level. Happy people don’t hurt people they want to share good things. hateful people have to hurt people to cover and hide the horror within themselves. Islam amd liberals the cult of hatefulness.