Outrageous: Obama Announces De Facto Amnesty For Illegal Immigrants, Will Allow Those Facing Deportation To Stay In America Indefinitely…
Could it be because he’s facing a brutal reelection effort and needs every vote he can muster?
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government says many illegal immigrants who don’t have criminal records but are facing possible deportation will get to stay in the U.S. indefinitely and have a chance to apply for a work permit.
Deporting illegal immigrants who are convicted criminals will be the Obama administration’s priority.
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says authorities will make a case-by-case review of the approximately 300,000 illegal immigrants who are facing possible deportation.
Immigration advocates say the Obama administration hasn’t lived up to its promise to only deport the “worst of the worst,” as the president has said.
Announcement about the new review probably will anger Republicans who contend that Obama has been too lenient on illegal immigrants.
Posted by ZIP on Thursday, August 18, 2011, at 3:13 pm | 
Tweet
“and have a chance to apply for a work permit”
———-
If they get a FREE pass, then what would they need with a work permit?
.
“who don’t have criminal records but are facing possible deportation”
———–
Since when is “Illegal Alien” not illegal?
.
Well, to be fair, he’s going to need all the votes he can get next year. The next step is to get ACORN 2.0 to get them to register to vote.
Next thing you know, multiple counts of DUI, hit and run and resisting arrest will be insufficient to warrant deportation: http://is.gd/J7Smo1
Could this be because Perry has a good record with Mexicans? Could Obama be scared? He should be. Mexicans will see right through this.
Looks like Odumbo has the Latino vote all sewn up
Black vote…check
Latino vote…check
Bye bye America……..
But if they can stay here indefinitely, living on welfare, what purpose does the “work permit” part of this plan serve?
He is once again in violation of his oath of office!
ILLEGAL is ILLEGAL!!!
That’s what bothers me- I don’t think every illegal immigrant is a career criminal bent on more mayhem or here for the sole purpose of bleeding us dry.
But the problem is, they’ve broken the law by their ongoing presence in this country and we’re supposed to take them at face value when we get some sort of assurance that they won’t break any MORE of our laws?
I thought this POS was on vacation??*!#@!!!
Two words for anybody of Mexican background that’s even thinking of supporting Obama in 2012.
FAST & FURIOUS
“Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., a longtime supporter of immigration overhaul and the DREAM Act, applauded the policy change.”
————-
Excuse me? The US congress exclusively creates the immigration policy in the United States.
The executive branch doesn’t have the option of making up it’s own rules.
.
Hahahahajihadhahahahaha.
Sit back and DO NOTHING bitches.
I am going to fk this nation so hard reggie love is gonna be jealous.
You guys make a great point that I overlooked (as usual), Obama’s plan is invalidated by the fact they’re already criminals because they’re here illegally. Not that he sees it that way because he’s a fucking putz.
Get rid of illegals, get Americans off their ass and off welfare, plenty of work for all. And don’t tell me we can’t deport all the criminals because it’s bullshit! They don’t want to deport them, people who hire them should be put in jail, thats the only way to slow down the “Cactus Tide”.
@gastorgrab
Obama does…
PatriotLady
He arrives at 5:15 in Martha’s Vineyard, I guess he figures he’d do as much damage as he could before landing on the island.
F*ckin’ sh1thead’s not an emperor, even if he thinks he’s one.
Conservatives need to call him out, loudly.
Define convicted.
The Dimocrats can’t grasp the meaning of illegal.
Impeachment anyone ? This little dictator obviously has no knowledge or respect for the limits to his office.
Submit the bill and let Congress vote. That’s how it works in America.
I have never prayed for anybodies demise before…
“…….and have a chance to apply for a work permit.”
———–
What will this do to our already high unemployment rate?
.
gastorgrab , exactly what I was I thinking, if they are added to the official numbers the unemployment rate will sky rocket.
This could backfire on BamO
Deport all of those here in the USA ILLEGALLY and Impeach Obozo. Thats all i have to say.
300,000 illegal immigrants without criminal records huh? Well, that’s 300,000 people that are here ILLEGALLY. So much for that lack of criminal record. Case closed.
Well, at least they won’t be able to vote. Oh, wait……
Right, because no American citizens need jobs.
Whaaaaaaaaa??? How can they possibly do this?
how have they been able to say thus far?
Identity theft? thats a crime.
Just another reason to vote out that illegal lover, Obama. Seems the loud and whining voices of illegals and racist advocates wins out over legal Americans. We know he is just sucking up for votes but Americans vote alot more than illegals. Vote out all Dems in ’12 and deport all illegals!
Their called illegal aliens for a reason their here illegaly and OBAMA IS A TRAITOR
Does this mean he’s gettingdown on his knees to plead for votes, or is he trying to declare the end of the United States?
All the Con artists in Congress will agree, and do nothing!
Our side of the aisle had better be doing something about this NOW…in UNISON!
GRIZZ:
Every night when I go to bed I say my prayers for this….
And the path to vote cheating begins.
they are not illegal immigrants, they are invaders!
we should send Mexico a bill for the expenses we incur caring for their citizen. $10K per invader per year should about cover it.
for 12M invaders, that amounts to a YEARLY amount of $120B. Mexico needs to start paying up, or we should send the U.S. military down their to kick their asses, starting with those assholes who play for the Mexican national soccer team!!!
Son of a bitch should be thrown in prison not just impeached.
Well the CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIEN commmunist moslim USURPER needs to deport himself to keep his word. But, alas, he’s a LIAR!!!!!!!
Shit! Obama’s here illegally. How many social security numbers does Barry actually have? You ain’t seen NOTHIN YET.
Obama is NOT doing his duty of securing the borders and now he’s rewarding law-breakers! Wow, now there’s a shock!
Breaking the laws for votes…the Democrat way!
Illegal=criminal.
It’s time to build a fence and stop illegal immigration.
Getting Hussein out of the WH will be like scraping fresh asphalt off your shoe..
‘Ulsterman: Obama…Democrats in general, already get the Black vote – most of it.
Insider: They want all of it. Every last one. Then bring in the Hispanic vote, tie them up in this race issue as well. Republicans want to toss you out. Obama wants to bring you in. They hate the color of Obama’s skin just like they hate the color of yours. Hey White America, you aren’t part of that group who hates non-whites are you? If not, you better get out and vote for Barack Obama.
Ulsterman: That sounds overly simplistic and insulting to voters. You really think something like that would actually work?
Insider: Hell yes-yes… it can work. It’s not gonna come so easy as it did in 2008, but that’s why they plan to ramp it up – the race issue. Look, you got generations of voters in this country who have been hammered with guilt for being white. Schools, television, movies…decades of this racism shit coming at them from all sides. White guilt is very real. I’ve used it-done it myself… countless times in an election campaign. And for Barack Obama…his re-election team – they are banking on it bringing victory in 2012. Even if it means the threat of race riots. They are willing to go that far – go down that road if need be. If the Obama team can’t guilt enough of White America into voting for them in 2012 – they are just fine with trying to scare the shit out of them to do it. And you need to know that there are a lot of Democrats who are hearing about this and are not on board. We’ve always used the race issue to our advantage – but what the Obama team has planned is something…it’s something else altogether. Off the charts stuff. Remember when I said that Obama ain’t no Democrat? That’s as true now as it’s ever been. And he’s on some kind of collission course now with everybody scrambling to get out of the way, and then some of us trying to do what we can to stop it before it’s too late. He’s already destroyed the party…much of it. Gonna take a long time to recover. Daley can’t stop this from within. He’s moderated the damage, but he’s wearing down. Now it’s the country we are worried about. My kids and grandkids will do all right without a Democratic Party around. They need to have an America though. The whole world does.’
http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/white-house-insider-the-obama-plan-part-two/
If the illegals don’t have to obey our laws, they why should we?
Let’s see, which law should I break first…….
This is not going to end well.
impeach now
@ Obama,
When are you finally going to just come out of the closet with Reggie? You could wrap up the gay vote while you are at it. You can keep Mooch as your house wookie (and field wookie for that matter).
When we have over 9% *reported* unemployment (and remember, those numbers only reflect those people drawing unemployment benefits, not those out of work and NOT on benefits), we have NO business importing workers! With these unemployment numbers, I would argue that there are few jobs that Americans won’t do.
How does Obama get to decide which laws have to be obeyed and which do not?
Does Chris Matthews give Obama the authority to do this? Does George Soros really have control over all that Obama does? People rejected Amnesty when McCain/Kennedy tried to force us the last time. How is it that it doesn’t matter what the actual citizens want?
Oboma is ILLEGAL and he knows it. So why deport ILLEGAL MEXICANS if it’s only going to further his cause. Peace of shit this crap in our WH.
So we’re only going to deport the “worst of the worst”, not the worst, not even the pretty bad or not so good? And just where do we draw the line between those who are the worst and those who are the worst of the worst? By whose standard Mr. President. Didn’t you take the oath to uphold the Constitution? I on the other hand may disagree with the current immigration law, may even support the DREAM act (although for the record I don’t) but the point is that I must change the law by advocating and by voting, not by breaking the law no matter how much I may sympathize with hardworking illegals. Shouldn’t our elected officials be held to a higher standard than the common citizen, and especially the President who must think of the best interests of the entire country?
BTW – thanks for the link S.Wolf. I knew it was coming but seeing it validated in print is just scarey. Read parts 1 and 2, can’t wait for the next installment.
IMPEACH this commie. He has broken just about every law in our Constitution and the only reason Congress has not started the impeachment process is because it will never get passed the Senate Democrap majority.
This is so not right. Criminals and Crazies in our Gov’t. Snuck in through the stupidity of the American Voter. We can only blame ourselves. NEVER AGAIN PLEASE!!!!
myrtle.. you’re welcome. Yup, it’s scary.. reverse racism.. but the good news is it will go away along with Hussein.
Mine fields, alligator moats, elevated sniper positions………let the buzzards pick their bones in the desert. I say to hell with them, we don’t need them for anything. Our fathers and grand fathers fought for freedom……..what have they contibuted?
*contributed
Looks like the amnesia prone moronic righties posting on here have forgotten that the Ol’ Gipper provided what was essentially amnesty for close to 3 million ‘illegal’ immigrants at the time. When the other side does it you all get cher undies in a bunch but when your side does you conveniently forget about it. Hypocrites much?
Clear sign the liberals are not to optimistic about 2012. This is pretty much political frickin’ suicide.
Al says:
August 18, 2011 at 5:44 pm
_____
hey dumbshit Al Bundy- do you know math—do you kwo the difference between 3 million and a then booming economy…and now 12-20 million and an near bankrupt country ? Is that too deep and complicated for you to ponder through teh reefer smoke ? And I guess I’ll really blow that little mind of yours by mentioning they will all be covered under Obamacare (the socialist/commie medical system)..is this getting through the skunk weed haze ?
It is the job of the president and his administration to enforce law. They don’t create OR interpret the law. This is the basic foundation of our constitution. Unfortunately, Obama has decided to shit on our constitution and only enforce the laws that they like. That is not how a democratic society based on the rule of law works.
Al get back in your troll hole. while reagan may have been wrong on that he wasn’t out to destroy this country like barry is. barry has done nothing except advance the communist agenda. now go back to your huffingtonpost, cnn, or where ever the cool hip commies are hanging out.
CL says:
August 18, 2011 at 6:17 pm
Al says:
August 18, 2011 at 5:44 pm
_____
hey dumbshit Al Bundy- do you know math—do you kwo the difference between 3 million and a then booming economy…and now 12-20 million and an near bankrupt country ? Is that too deep and complicated for you to ponder through teh reefer smoke ? And I guess I’ll really blow that little mind of yours by mentioning they will all be covered under Obamacare (the socialist/commie medical system)..is this getting through the skunk weed haze ?
Not sure why all of the name calling and factless assumptions. Booming economy during Reagn years? Unemployment rate hovered around 10% at about the same time during Reagan’s first term in office. Seems like there are more than a few parallels between your messiah Reagan and the left’s messiah BO. The problem in this country is the almost religious like zeal that folks like yourself heave upon one or the other political party. Both parties are two sides of the same coin. How is that for math? Do some basic research CL and others calling me a troll. Google is your friend.
P.S. BO will be gone next year. Let’s just hope who ever takes the helm can turn this ship around.
President Obama – you have disgraced my Grandmother and Grandfather for the last time. FU! You stupid POS!
Well that decision should help illegals get jobs over the people who actually were born in the US, good idea Obama once again he chooses non-Americans to give supremacist status to. He needs their votes by the way.
Is Obama trying to throw himself on his sword to give the Democrats a shot in the ’12 election?
Can anyone explain why “Treason” is too strong a word to describe our government officials?
There has been opposition to immigration since the 1800s, however there has never been a justifiable legal foundation for stopping immigration into the country. In much the same way unions acted on corrupt businesses from the late 1800s there needs to be some harsh union like formats which acts on politicians. Obama’s motive for letting immigrants in would be purely political, to obtain votes and gain allies. It serves no practical purpose otherwise and would be more of a burden on society. Obama may be violating established immigration laws.
Obama will find a way to give them the vote before 2012.
The fraud involved will be mind blowing. Public schools have been ramping up the offers for Adult Education enrollment for “Parenting” and “Intro to Computer” classes en Espanol. All one has to do to qualify for “student” status is to enroll.
Damage From ‘Citizenship USA’ [INS] Can Never Be Undone
May 12, 1997
Last year the press revealed rampant corruption and abuse in the Clinton Administration’s scandal-wracked “Citizenship USA” program, a blatant attempt to naturalize a million prospective Clinton voters before the Presidential election.
News reports showed: (1) that control of the supposedly non-partisan $95 million taxpayer-funded initiative was moved from the INS to the Clinton White House; (2) that the Administration turned naturalization over to advocacy groups linked to the Democratic Party; and (3) that the Administration failed to complete FBI background checks for nearly 20% of the record-breaking 1.05 million people naturalized in FY 1996.
In the ensuing scandal, the Clinton Administration repeatedly promised wholesale reforms that would undo the damage from Citizenship USA and prevent future abuses. Now internal reports, outside reviews, and House and Senate hearings have revealed that these were hollow promises. By the Administration’s own admission, the program remains a shambles, and the damage it has wrought can never be undone.
“Citizenship USA” and its Aftermath
The abuses in Citizenship USA have been widely reported, and on April 28, 1997 the Justice Department’s Inspector General opened a massive investigation into allegations of “mismanagement, misconduct, and illegality” in the program. Members of Congress have asked Attorney General Janet Reno to appoint an Independent Counsel to investigate all aspects of the scandal, including the role of the Vice President–a request she has rejected.(1) In response to the avalanche of criticism, the Clinton Administration has repeatedly promised to tighten screening procedures around the nation and to revoke the citizenship of those improperly naturalized under the program. These promises have not been kept.
“No Assurance That INS Is Not Continuing to Incorrectly Naturalize Aliens”
On November 29, 1996, Doris Meissner, Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), issued a memorandum on “Naturalization Quality Procedures” outlining reforms, to be implemented immediately, designed to correct the abuses in the Citizenship USA program. In March 1997 joint oversight hearings before two House subcommittees, Commissioner Meissner categorically asserted that, although “[w]e made mistakes in Citizenship USA[,] [w]e have corrected those mistakes and put in place a series of new measures to prevent them in the future.”(2)
On April 17, 1997, the accounting and consulting firm KPMG Peat Marwick completed an exhaustive 140-page survey, commissioned by the Department of Justice, of the INS ‘s implementation of the reforms. The survey was based on on-site reviews at each of 24 regional and district offices over the course of five weeks. The offices collectively account for 85% of INS’ naturalization workload.(3) Its results were appalling: of the 24 INS offices surveyed, exactly one was found “compliant” with the new procedures. Fifteen–almost two-thirds–were found to be flatly “non-compliant,” and seven were rated “marginally compliant.” As Chairman Abraham of the Senate Immigration Subcommittee stated in oversight hearings on May 1, 1997: One District Office and two Citizenship USA sites could not produce the particular policy memo they were supposed to be implementing. Numerous offices were sending fingerprint cards to the wrong FBI address, fingerprint cards were completed incorrectly, and worksheets that were required to be dated and initialed showed no evidence of key tasks being completed.(4)
Small wonder the private-sector auditors stated categorically, “We cannot provide assurance that INS is not continuing to incorrectly naturalize aliens with disqualifying conditions.”
“A Gaping Loophole” for Fraud
The INS did not issue regulations to secure the integrity of its criminal background checks until three years after the Justice Department’s Inspector General and the General Accounting Office warned the INS of what the Washington Post called “a gaping loophole” in its procedures. The gaping loophole was the fact that “[t]he INS, anxious to streamline the citizenship process, began accepting fingerprints handed in by the applicants themselves rather than performing the time-consuming procedure in its offices.”(5) The result was that aliens with criminal records could easily cheat the system by switching someone else’s fingerprints in place of their own.(6)
But, even after a three-year delay in addressing this critical weakness, the system is still dangerously flawed. The final program does not require the INS or even a law enforcement agency to take the applicants’ fingerprints. Rather, any “Designated Fingerprint Service” certified by the INS–or even one not certified, but which is in the process of applying for certification–would be able to forward the applicants’ fingerprints on their own say-so. Worse, the new regulations actually permit such services to employ persons convicted of aggravated felonies and “crimes involving dishonesty.”(7) And the INS list of services with approved or pending applications (i.e., organizations currently authorized to submit fingerprints, since simply filing an application qualifies an organization to submit fingerprints) includes liquor stores, hairstylists, photo shops, bridal shops, and advocacy groups. Even Hermandad Mexicana Nacional in Los Angeles, now under investigation for illegal alien vote fraud in the 1996 election, remains authorized to collect applicants’ fingerprints.
As a result, Peat Marwick’s audit found that the “INS continues to have the most significant control problems with the fingerprint process and the identification of statutorily-barred applicants.” The Washington Post recently reported: At the Nebraska Service Center, one of two regional INS facilities in the central United States, 95 percent of the fingerprint cards received during the period under review were rejected because of errors in filling them out, Peat Marwick said. In addition, the center and two others like it were found to be sending fingerprint cards to a “wrong FBI address.” Nevertheless, the Nebraska center was rated in “marginal compliance” with the new regulations, while others in California, Texas and Vermont were deemed “noncompliant.”(8)
And the Nebraska Service Center is not just any INS facility–it’s the site of the nationwide “Fingerprint Clearance Coordination Center” established in June 1996 to upgrade INS processing of fingerprint cards.
Repairing the Damage: “Highly Uncertain,” Says INS
In the aftermath of the scandal, the Clinton INS promised to revoke the citizenship of those it had improperly naturalized.(9) This promise is also being broken. As a result of the Citizenship USA program, 180,000 immigrants naturalized in 1996 did not undergo any fingerprint checks for criminal records. Now that these 180,000 have become citizens, the FBI and the INS cannot require them to provide their fingerprints for background checks. The INS has no other practicable way to check them.
Furthermore, according to an internal memo from INS General Counsel David Martin to Commissioner Doris Meissner, “it is highly uncertain that the Department could win or sustain a revocation based on a misrepresentation in the absence of proof of an underlying statutory disqualification. . . .” In other words, even if the INS and FBI could prove that newly naturalized aliens lied on their citizenship applications, it would be impossible to denaturalize them unless they had also been convicted of a felony–despite the fact that lying in such circumstances ordinarily precludes naturalization.
In short, the improper naturalizations rammed through the process at the direction of the Clinton White House to assist the President’s re-election are permanent. They will never be undone.
Conclusion
In politically abusing the United States agency and system that confers the gift of citizenship, the White House violated one of the most solemn responsibilities of government–and exposed the nation to new criminal predators in the bargain. When the scandal was exposed, the Clinton Administration promised Congress and the American people that the corruption and fraud would cease forthwith. They promised that criminals would no longer be admitted to citizenship. And they promised that those criminals already admitted would be found and stripped of citizenship. None of these promises has been fulfilled; the last, by the Administration’s own admission, never will be.
http://www.justice-denied.net/INSCorruption_01.htm
So much for Obama’s “oath of office”, so much for the rule of law, so much for America being different from the rest of the world. Guess we can expect nothing less from one who grew up in a country where people die that dissent.
You should know that as of 7:54 a.m. on the 19th, the AP post has been re-written. It omits “the government” and “the Obama administration” as the actors and substutes Janet Napolitano and DHS.
If your quote was verbatim, they’ve extensively rewritten the lead grafs.
This doesn’t happen for no reason.
This action and its timing should be classified as this weeks “Friday News Dump”
Don’t you think so, Zip?
Seems like this crap happens at the end of every weekly news cycle, giving us the weekend to forget…
Obama wants all Hispanics to be viewed as illegal aliens.
Illegal aliens are technically and legally subject to deportation at any time.
Their very presence violates federal law.
Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting, harboring or in any way encouraging illegal aliens is a felony offence:
http://americanpatrol.com/REFERENCE/AidAbetUnlawfulSec8USC1324.html
No Al I for one did not cheer it 30 years ago and I damn sure don’t cheer it now,thats not peanut butter behind your ears
this joke of a president will do ANYTHING to stay in power…even to do something that most Americans wholeheartedly disagree with. He is a disgusting, pandering tool and i am embarrassed to have him as this great nations president.
Remember to put $500.00 in your dependent box for income tax. Seriously