I accept the fact that Obama was born a mooslim, went to a mooslim school in Indonesia, attended Mosque with this step father, and then attended the church of an anti-semetic, anti American, racist “pastor” for 20 years. That does NOT make him a Christian. Let’s see the record of Baptism, shall we? If it exists, Obama is an appostate which is punishable by death according to the Religion of Pieces.

His claimed father was muslim. That ‘religion’ follows the father to the children.

‘Nuff said.

And BO has already referred to ‘his muslim faith’. On television with Snuffleupagus having to correct him.

What more proof does anyone need?

How about how BO thinks that the muslim call to prayer is the most beautiful sound?

Is that enough for ya?

So,what if anything was Franklin Marshall Davis? DNA Tests would be very revealing.

Liberals are steering the debate away from Obama’s abysmal record and are defining the topics of this election campaign…social issues like religion, contraceptives, etc. and the Republicans are stupidly falling into the Liberals’ trap. The topics need to be unemployment and the economy…Obama can’t win on these. I’m afraid it’s 4 more years of Obama if the Republicans can change their game.

* Republicans can’t

I don’t think Santorum was prepared to answer this question at all. Most Republican candidates are NOT prepared to do so. Why? (you might ask)

The plain fact of the matter is Obama’s ‘church”, with Jeremiah Wright preached BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY which is Communism masked as Religion. (http://www.acton.org/pub/commentary/2008/04/02/marxist-roots-black-liberation-theology)

I would like to hear Santorum retract this statement that Obama is a Christian, because Obama is NOT a Christian. Santorum would also have to be prepared to do a comparison of what Christianity is and what Black Liberation Theology is, but that means research and understanding of what the difference is. That being said, I wonder if any of the Republican Candidates have the conviction and motivation to address this issue. They are going to have overcome their fear of the Leftist dominated Media and tell the truth and I am not at all certain any of them are willing to do this.

born a muslim always a muslim,. right obama

rut roh.

I agree. I get it. and its not about religion.

Green is the new Economics. the greed. the change. god’s gifts to man, control.

i saw a celebrity advertising for shampoo and told me to use this product so to keep the planet clean – as the commercial ended, today, this morning.

thanks!

He’s a statist. You can’t serve two masters.

Obama is about as christian as the Taliban suicide bomber!

In Illinois, the dead aren’t just voting…

Sex with the dead? Illinois bill would make it illegal

It also would criminalize something that even Madison County Coroner Steve Nonn thought was already illegal — having sex with the dead.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/proposed-illinois-law-would-outlaw-moving-or-sex-with-corpses/article_df0bfc9f-7811-5606-bc1d-4a7e85387703.html
—————————————————–
the democrats sure think of everything when using the dead

in barky’s mind Obama is the Religion. long term plan. corraling the Arabian Muslamics as we speak so the Chicago NOI can reign as supreme in due time.

barky and company aren’t even Athiests as that would even give some semblance to the thought of a Creator.

busted. science is the alpha and omega. and how its orchestrated. its hierarchy.

Ca-ching. shut up and sit down, next!

How can an evil hell spawn of Satan be a Christian.

Obviously, this Anti-Christ is not fooling -everyone-.

I accept the fact that he says he is a Christian, but do not believe it.

I hope Santorum continues to aggressively go after o-hole, personally and politically. He should have explained the United Trinity Church of Hate and rev. wrong. Gone into Black Lib Theology. Bring all the facts out especially when he has a national audience.
Educate lib fools like this mfm hack. Take charge of the narrative. Go on offense instead of back peddling and conceding any imagined positive thing abt. o-hole. He is what he is.
Fck pulling your punches and being conciliatory with the enemy. That old fart was out to make Santorum look bad.

i could be wrong but i think the “belief” part was a segue to the point.

like alright, uhmm, doesn’t matter. just sayin.

christian or not christian is of no import. the antiAmerican part is of essence.

Love how some get their panties in a wad over a candidates expressing his beliefs, yet it is perfectly fine for Hussein and the O-bot minions to shove communistic liberation/marxist theology up our collective arses. Someone please tell me what the difference is.

Oh, I know, in no way has Santorum or any other R indicated they will squat on the Constitution to make their “religious” beliefs the law of the land.

Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. He’s a fake conservative, he’s too conservative to get elected. He’s not strong enough, he’s too controversial. I watched the entire attack….err interview and thought Rick did great.

Santorum should realize that these condescending people need to be put in their place. Also his handlers need to learn that it is not only what you say, but HOW it is said. This is constructive criticism. He made it sound too much as though he was wining, instead of a steady authoritative voice in the style of Charles Krauthammer.
Some people simply do not realize it is Very important how you come across to the vast audiences who get their ideas about a candidate from television, and internet sources! God Bless America!

Obama is an atheist. I know his type. Way too arrogant to believe in God.

Someone should tell Santorum that it is not a FACT that Obama is a Christian.

It is only Obama’s claim that he is a Christian!

He sure hasn’t shown much Christianity in his “administration”!

Santorum says Obama’s agenda not based on the Bible
Rick Moran

Is this really that important? Reuters:

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum challenged President Barack Obama’s Christian beliefs on Saturday, saying White House policies were motivated by a “different theology.”

A devout Roman Catholic who has risen to the top of Republican polls in recent days, Santorum said the Obama administration had failed to prevent gas prices rising and was using “political science” in the debate about climate change.

Obama’s agenda is “not about you. It’s not about your quality of life. It’s not about your jobs. It’s about some phony ideal. Some phony theology. Oh, not a theology based on the Bible. A different theology,” Santorum told supporters of the conservative Tea Party movement at a Columbus hotel.

When asked about the statement at a news conference later, Santorum said, “If the president says he’s a Christian, he’s a Christian.”

But Santorum did not back down from the assertion that Obama’s values run against those of Christianity.

“He is imposing his values on the Christian church. He can categorize those values anyway he wants. I’m not going to,” Santorum told reporters.

Santorum did indeed “categorize” Obama’s values. He said his “theology” – presumably from where those values spring – is not “based on the Bible.”

It isn’t a question of Santorum being right or wrong. It’s a question of relevance. Does it really matter whether a candidate bases his political beliefs on the Bible?

In the narrow world of social conservatives, no doubt the answer is yes. As for the rest of America, it probably doesn’t matter as much and indeed, puts off independents and potential swing Democratic voters who may share many of those “values” with Obama.

If one wants to argue that the Obama agenda isn’t good for America, that’s winning politics. Arguing that the president’s agenda isn’t based on the Bible is a different story.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/santorum_says_obamas_agenda_not_based_on_the_bible.html

Lot’s of interesting and intelligent comments.

Sickofobama, thanks for the link to American Thinker -I checked it out, great letter/story/analysis.

I’ll point out the following thing that I’m sure everyone here has heard long ago and knows well: actions speak louder than words… so while he “says” he’s a Christian,” my conclusions on the truth of the matter are based not on his words, but his deeds -which, I submit, speak for themselves.

Rick Please.

You could have framed this differently, but I was not in your shoes at the time.

social engineering.

not God, Country, Family, Neighbors, but:

Community, the World, Family, CoWorkers, and god if its convenient and fits in somewhere. Change, the Hope. the Cash.

Fishy Commentator says:
…
I would like to hear Santorum retract this statement that Obama is a Christian, because Obama is NOT a Christian.

__
no.
That’s above Santorum’s or anyone else’s pay grade. Even if it were a theological debate.. which it isn’t –only the doctrine is in scrutiny– not the man’s profession.

That’s wholly his nine-yards before God, so to speak.

and if it does spin that way in the court of public opinion– he just lost the debate. He’s probably painted too religious in all things already. He needs to refine that message to the secular landscape.

He can redirect the press’s questions to his prior comments, and launch from there to the security and economic straits we’re in.. not that the media would report it that way tho.

Look what the press so-called did to Palin, attributing things to her that she never said.. but the smear was effective.

U LIE!!!

I wish Santorum had answered differently. Sometimes distinctions need to be made.

I realize that the question was a set-up, but wish he had answered the question with a very specific question of his own, “have you ever heard Obama acknowledge that Christ died for his sins? Because that is the essence of Christianity, and I’ve never heard him say it.”

Interestingly .. Did you know that the word “christian” is a pagan religionist label which has come to usurp/obscure “in faith believing” which it can not? Acts 11:26 .. in most of the middle east it commonly is applied as meaning outside the Islamic religion ..

Al taqiyya / deception: concealment for personal or corporate gain, preservation or partisan advancement…To practice deceit or guile or circumvention, practice evasion or elusion, to plot, to excercise art or craft or cunning, act with policy, practice strategem…snare or trap or profane or take away from the unsuspecting, the simpleminded, the old, weak or innocent…

Told ya’ Santorum was a putz.

Rick, you should have blown off that question and just stuck to your guns. We know what you meant – you never came right out and said it – that Obama is a Muslim – but it was inferred and I’m glad you said it. It shows that Obama and his minions are sensative over the issue and you got them riled up. That should have been the end of it. Let them get riled up. We WANT them riled up. Don’t try to gloss over something that you said by backpeddling. It’s not a winning strategy when the horse has already left the barn. LEAVE WELL ENOUGH ALONE. If someone asks you what you meant by saying what you did, just tell them to think about it – tell them that people can make their own judgements, and then shut the heck up. These politicians are wayyy too busy telling people how they should think. WE DON’T NEED YOU TELLING US HOW TO THINK. We can make up our own minds about whether or not we think Obama is a Muslim. I, for one, think he is. The church photo-ops and his lies about being a Christian are all politicially motivated – like everything he says and does.

Santorum’s response is disappointing.

He raised excellent questions and made excellent observations about Obama’s character earlier, and now this wimpy statement.

It’s about Obama’s actions, that’s the essence of all that is known about him, about his character and about his dubious character (and questionable beliefs): his behavior, his actions.

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+7:15-17&version=NASB

Matthew 7:15-17

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

A Tree and Its Fruit
15 “Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. 16 You will [a]know them by their fruits. [b]Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they? 17 So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit.
Footnotes:

Matthew 7:16 Or recognize
Matthew 7:16 Lit They do not gather

Perfect example of a gutless republican politician backing away from the hard facts . Anything to kiss the left wing media ass .

He is a Rev. Wright/ James Cone “christian”. They have taken the term Christian and redefined it to fit the god they have created in their own image.

The Kenyan IS a Muslim!
He may admit it when we hand him the election on a platter.
Served up by the nitwit bunch we have to chose from.
In his terms, when he admits it, it’ll be rubbing our faces in it!

Katherine says:
February 19, 2012 at 2:32 pm

I wish Santorum had answered differently. Sometimes distinctions need to be made.
__________

He did make a distinction, he mentioned that Obama’s theology is not a Biblical theology, thus distinguishing what Obama says he believes with what he actually does.

I think Obama has prove to you ALL that he is the BIGGEST LYING PRESIDENT – USA has ever had in history. His lying days will be over the day he meets the master face to face.

Obama may not be the same as Hitler, but he is cut from the same cloth as Hitler in regards to his black nationalist religious beliefs and also the teachings of Saul Alinisky. There are some differences, though. Mainly, Obama and his minions are not yet nearly as effective and organized as the Nazis were, but they keep trying to improve.

It is ironic that we have so many Jews and Germans so enthusiastically supporting this Afro-Nazi movement with their genocidal doctrine of destruction of the white race. But then, there were many Americans deceived by the original Nazis up until WWII actually started.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/18/santorum-obamas-agenda-amounts-to-some-phony-theology/
Santorum: Obama’s Agenda Amounts to ‘Some Phony Theology’

SO WHAT IS THE TRUTH HERE?