If only the liberals would have been extinguished by global warming we would be safe.
Xavier
^Exactly what I was thinking. That’s an interesting site.
crudcutter
I think abortion has a better chance than global warming. Why are we paying for NASA when it has obviously gone bat shit crazy and sends nothing into space? Shut it down and privatize space travel.
big-pete
The great thing about being a global warming alarmist is that you can be consistently wrong yet still continue to make a decent living. I wish I had that sort of security.
Separate Reality
At least the article ran next to a picture of Pepe le Phew.
bitterclinger
I don’t know whether to
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
or
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
*wheeze*
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !
Blackrifleman
Watson won an accolade from the American Association for the Advancement of Science Award for Scientific Freedom and Responsibility (1993.) The key word here is “responsibility.” Responsible for creating the kudzu-like phenomenon that is “global-warming.”
According to Sovereignty International, in 1997 Robert Watson:
was asked in a press briefing about the growing number of climate scientists who challenge the conclusions of the UN that man-induced global warming is real and promises cataclysmic consequences. Watson responded by denigrating all dissenting scientists as pawns of the fossil fuel industry. “The science is settled” he said, and “we’re not going to reopen it here.” [6]
crudcutter
@big pete
Like being a weatherman in Cleveland, OH. Right 10% of the time you’re a fluking genius.
ed357
Judging by the “SQUIRREL BUDDY” advertisement next to the NASA 1986 article predicting that “All Life Extinct In A Few Decades Due To Global Warming”……..
Even in 1986 people knew that “GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISTS” were nucking futs.
;->
http://www.myway.com Terry L Smith
Gee, I am not dead, as of this writing … must not have received the corporate memo!
Katherine
I hate to tell these idiots this, but that loss of ozone could very well be caused by an approaching shift of the magnetic poles.
We are long overdue for this shift. I hope these idiots aren’t going to try to pass this off as due to climate change. There are a lot of people going to be screaming about their stupidity if they do.
NoSleep
That explains the 7 billion people in the world.
The majority of which live in China,where you can cut the filthy air with a knife,and 3rd world countries that cook,bathe,drink and crap in the same water.
Both cut down every tree they can find and eat everything from bugs to endangered animals to cows blood and albinos.
Katherine
Sorry, I didn’t notice the date on the paper….
What I said still applies though. There will be a shift of the magnetic pole, and it will disturb the ozone.
Guy from Utah
Love the caption Zip. You make me laugh everyday. Thanks.
NoSleep
Katherine says:
“I hate to tell these idiots this, but that loss of ozone could very well be caused by an approaching shift of the magnetic poles. ”
And aren’t we due another mini ice age as the axial decrease indicates since it has been lessening the last 20+ yrs ?(i hope i stated that correctly )
And the Japanese earthquake /tsunami caused a further decrease by 0.05 degrees ?
vangrungy
The Montreal Protocol was a fraud as well..
UV creates ozone.. when the earth’s pole is tilted away from the sun, ozone is not created..
Dupont just wanted Freon banned because their worldwide patent had run out.. and they had HCFCs ready to be used…
Freon is the most efficient refrigerant.. think of all the energy that would be saved
Dr. Will Happer of Princeton wrote “The Montreal Protocol to ban freons was the warm-up exercise for the IPCC. Many current IPCC players gained fame then by stampeding the US Congress into supporting the Montreal Protocol. They learned to use dramatized, phony scientific claims like “ozone holes over Kennebunkport” (President Bush Sr’s seaside residence in New England). The ozone crusade also had business opportunities for firms like Dupont to market proprietary “ozone-friendly” refrigerants at much better prices than the conventional (and more easily used) freons that had long-since lost patent protection and were not a cheap commodity with little profit potential”
By providing data from a ground-based solar Fourier transform spectrometer instrument at the University, CAC used 15-years worth of information to verify the satellite’s story: all existing global models had substantially misjudged the main source of formic acid levels on earth – its forests.
Article Five
That’s only if obama gets reelected.
Economan
If were’re dead, then this must be hell, Obama is President.
http://vloggerheads.com Jfry
Why is the headline of this article so misleading ? The line with extinct says 500 to 1000 years…. The decades line only talks about “significant changes in climate” …. Even the lead in says “eventual extinction”….
Not that I don’t believe that this entire farce is simply another hoax to enslave the world under yet another tax ….
We like to complain about the MSM …. Why do the same as them though ?
Thx for the link though….
LuLu
Economan ; You got that right. No “junk science” here.
Spurwing Plover
I suggest NASA stick to landing a colony on MARS and send that JAMES HANSEN as the first ambasador to the matians and hope MARVIN and K-9 have a big surprise waiting for him like a whole bunch of INSTANT MARTIANS and JUST ADD WATER
thesixfour
Maybe they meant rational thought would be dead.
Yeah that’s got to be it…
SpideyTerry
Eh, I would’ve thought the afterlife – regardless of whether going upstairs or downstairs – would’ve been more interesting than this.
http://genelalor.com berlet98
Politically Prostituting NASA
NASA Administrator Charles Bolden is a graduate of the Naval Academy, a retired, highly decorated Marine major general, and a former astronaut. Bolden is also a dutiful politician.
NASA’s website cites the agency’s aim to “pioneer the future in space exploration and aeronautic research” and outlines its “vision”: “To reach for new heights and reveal the unknown so that what we do and learn will benefit all humankind.”
There is no mention anywhere on the NASA site of getting involved international politics, such as improving relations with Islam, or promoting the global warming scam but both are on its agenda.
Bolden demonstrated that NASA’s mission had radically changed a year after he was named administrator when he said during an interview with Al Jazeera, the Arabic language news network. Under Bolden, NASA’s is being politicized and its “foremost” mission is to improve relations with the Muslim world, and not space exploration or aeronautic research.
He told Al Jazeera that he was “ordered” to effectively forget NASA’s historic mission of space pioneering, etc. and to adopt a totally new and markedly different goal. As Bolden admitted to the voice of Islam, “Obama wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science. . . and math and engineering.”
At the behest of his boss, Bolden was abandoning NASA’s position as the world’s pre-eminent scientific body in order to serve “foremost” as cheerleaders for ancient Muslim achievements, that is, to fulfill Barack Hussein Obama’s political ambition to suck up to Islam and help Muslims “feel good” about themselves.
That extreme departure contradicted the president’s own words spoken in March, 2009.
At that time, he said, “Let’s be clear: promoting science isn’t just about providing resources–it is also about protecting free and open inquiry. It is about letting scientists . . . do their jobs, . . . It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda–and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology.”
Except when those decisions and facts conflict with Obama’s ideology.
NASA has again departed from its mission on another Obama pet issue–the lie of anthropogenic global warming. . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=21481.)
CR
Perhaps Watson is on to something. Suppose we are all dead. The earth warmed so much that it burned a hole right through space-time into a parallel universe. We became stuck on the event horizon of the resulting wormhole. This warped reality enough to allow absurd events to become normal, such as Hussein Obama, Biden, Holder, NBPP, race-baiting, free healthcare, OWS, global-warming nonsense, and all the other oddities.
Either that or the Large Hadron Collider malfunctioned again. Or everyone went crazy for no apparent reason. Whatever is going on, I don’t like it…no sir, I don’t like it at all. I can’t wait for this winter, with elections and Mayan doomsday predictions all at once. At least we won’t be bored.
GM Car Of The Future
NASA believed this?
Now I KNOW we didn’t land on the Moon.
Laura Castellano
Well, since we’re already fucked, LET’S PARTY!!
dba…vagabond trader
ALL these junk scientists and their tax funded jobs must be carefully scrutinized in the next administration.
fubar
this is unbelievable.
i had an argument with a lib recently who was incensed that TN was going to allow ‘global worming skeptics” to speak in public schools (or the arguments to be allowed)
and when I said something to similar to what vangrungy said about the freon/cfc’s she looked like she’d been smacked in the face.
end of argument. (but she probably won’t speak to me ever again –good)
GrumpyOne
Yellowstone which is about 35,000 years overdue for an eruption will take care of globule wormin’ and a lot of other things like four billion of over population on the planet.
Nature has a way… And, I’m thankful that I’m not one day younger than I am!
Now it’s time for another nap..
bobdog
We won’t make it 31 years. The liberals will make life on earth impossible long before that.
Bezelbub’s Paradise
About that same time oprah losefree was stating half of America would die of Aids. Genius Lifestyles prevailed then.
Chuck_Barry
This has always been the biggest part of the global warming lie, that it would destroy all life on earth.
In the millions of years that life has existed on earth the climate has varied from extremely tropical to ice age, even now there is a wide variation in temperatures from the equator to the poles, yet life has thrived in all of these conditions.
It would take a hell of a lot more than a few degrees change in temperature to kill us all off.
TexaSwede
The squirrel in that ad sort of summarizes the theory of AGW: NUTS!