two too many

Much to his dismay. Let’s hope this is his one and only term. I will croak if he gets reelected.

Is this another one of his promises??

“I’m term-limited.”

——-

That’s what Vladimir Putin once said.

Oh man, how desperate can you get – a remark calculated for the audience to scream out how they want him to be President forever and ever and ever? You’re like a 16 year-old asking if the dress makes her look fat. There’s only one ego-stroke answer to the question.

I don’t read that as a promise, more like a threat… Remember open-mic “flexibility”?

And thank God for that.

He’s letting everyone know that if he wins he’s really going to step up the destruction of America and become dictator for life.

He’s been saying this a lot recently which makes me queasy. Will he be calling a national emergency and we won’t have an election?

I’m curious why he keeps making this point. Is it that he’s counting on his constituents not to know that US Presidents are limited to two terms? Or is he wanting the ego-stroke of having them beg him to run again, run again?

what supercracker said above – he’s not going away for a long time. Just like rev jesse jackson and al from msnbc, they’re community organizers, it’s what they do.

If McLame had won in 08 you can bet baraka would running this time around, with the campaign slogan ‘it’s my time’

When a known con man keeps bringing up a point that should be obvious it’s a good sign they are either looking for a way to twist it into a tool to get what they want, or are trying to distract you from what you should be thinking about. I keep expecting their fundraisers to start looking like a timeshare hard-sell.

WE ARE SO SCREWED… We have to win this election.. READ THIS AND THEN MAKE UP YOUR OWN MINDS. But I would advise you to pass it along to everyone you know.

For the first time in over two years of ongoing interviews, a powerful and highly influential Wall Street insider allows for direct interview participation of a figure we will simply call “Military Insider”. What follows is the first of a two part interview with both of these individuals who are warning of an impending manufactured crisis within the United States by powers desperate to secure a second term for “the man calling himself Obama”. For those who have followed these insider interviews from the beginning – you know just how accurate they have proven to be. Please remind yourself of that as you read this latest discussion.

PART ONE:

UM: Can we begin?
WSI: (Broad smile) Yes – and might I just say this before we do…it is so very nice to see you again in person.

UM: I’m just as glad to see you looking so much better. Out of the woods?
WSI: No-no…at my age one is always “in the woods” if you will. But at this point, I’m not helping to fertilize the trees just yet! (laughs)
Read more in News
« “Food Poisoning”

UM: Why did you decide to invite him here? I’m glad – honored, to have them here, but can you explain…briefly explain why you’ve done this?
WSI: Certainly. I invited…I guess that term is sufficient…I invited them here for no other reason than to have what they know and what their experience tells them – I wanted that perspective to now be included in this from the first person. I…we…-name deleted- and I decided it would be best, when possible, to have this information come to you without the filter of our own interpretations.
UM: How long have you known each other?
WSI: (Looks over at MI) That would be…nearly twenty years? Perhaps a bit more?
MI: Twenty three years.
WSI: That long? Really?
MI: Just over twenty-three years. That’s correct.
UM: Have you known –name deleted- that long as well?
MI: No.
WSI: I introduced them…it wasn’t more than a few years ago. Shortly after the election…in 2008. Shortly after –name deleted- told me there had been a terrible mistake made. That Obama being elected had been a terrible mistake. Then I began hearing similar things from him…the concern that was…mounting within the military and intelligence community regarding the new president.
UM: Can you expand on that? Those concerns. What were they?
WSI: You’ve already – we’ve already been down that path. A number of times.
UM: I’d like to hear it from him. If that’s ok. Their perspective. Unfiltered. Like you just said you wanted.
(Military Insider looks at WSI)
WSI: If they wish to share that with you…that is certainly fine. But I would caution there is a great deal of information that this interview is to…coordinate with your own efforts…you may not want to spend too much time rehashing what was. I would rather concentrate on what I now know that is going to be…or what some hope is to be.
UM: We’ve got time – I really want to hear them describe these concerns. It’s those concerns that pushed us to this point, right? So if you’re comfortable with that – please…you can be brief if you want…but tell us a bit about those concerns back then. After 2008. Or before 2008 if there were concerns before then.
MI: There were.
UM: Concerns? Before 2008? About Obama?
MI: Yes.
UM: What were they?
MI: The first real warning was Mr. Obama’s carpet bombing villages comment against the military. That…I apologize for the term…that pissed all of us off – or most of us. At least those of us not put in place by the communists. The pro-union…the pro-Big Labor faction.
UM: Did you just say communists? In the U.S. military?
MI: Yes.
UM: Please – can you please explain that.
MI: Communists. Communist supporters. Sympathizers. Or socialists. Or globalists might be the right…a more accurate term. Big government…One World…that whole concept. It’s real. As real these chairs. That wall. The air in your lungs.

UM: Agenda 21? That conspiracy theory? And the United States military?
MI: Yes – not a conspiracy. It’s real. It exists. And it’s happening right now.
UM: Agenda 21 is non-binding.
MI: That is…not accurate.
UM: No – it’s a non-binding agreement. It’s…it was more a show than anything of substance.
MI: No sir. You are wrong. Your dismissal…that was the outcome…that was the intended outcome of calling it that.
UM: What?
MI: Non-binding. Voluntary.
UM: But that’s what it is – it was a non-binding bullsh-t agreement for the environmentalists.
MI: It’s only as non-binding as the executives who will use the authority granted within that document choose to act on that authority.
UM: What?
MI: That document was a blueprint. Have you actually read it?
UM: Not…not all of it. No.
MI: Then why are you presuming to know what it is – or isn’t?
UM: I wasn’t presuming – or…I was trying to get around the idea of communists running the United States military.
MI: That’s not what I said.
UM: You just did – that’s…yes, that’s what you just said.
MI: No.
UM: Ok…you explain to me what you just said. About the communists, the globalists…all of that. What did you say?
MI: You posed a question about warnings regarding Mr. Obama? Before the 2008 election.
UM: Yeah – and you said that pissed off the military – at least those not put in place by the communists. That’s what you said. Right?
MI: Yes.
UM: So – what’s the problem?
MI: What I did not say was that communists were running the United States military. You said that. Not me.
UM: What’s the difference?
MI: Communists, Big Labor, globalists…those factions have infiltrated the U.S. military. They are not running the U.S. military. That is a distinction of epic proportions. You may not fully appreciated the difference but in my world – all due respect…in my world…BIG DIFFERENCE.
WSI: And this plan…the globalization of the American military…it’s been planned, slowly implemented…for a long time. It’s been happening right under our noses.
UM: It began with Agenda 21 – during the Clinton era?
MI: Incorrect.
UM: What?
MI: Agenda 21 did not begin during the Clinton era. It was developed long before that. In fact, it culminated under President Bush. HW.
WSI: But it goes back much farther than that. I only learned of this more recently myself.
MI: Yes sir – much farther. Decades of planning. A multiple series of five year plans.
UM: Five year plans?
WSI: Just like Stalin. A slow progression…a creeping monster that comes in five year increments. Cutting away at freedom and liberty and individuality.
MI: Yes sir. Just like that.
UM: So how far back does this Agenda 21 go?
MI: You are admitting you don’t know – but you were just attempting to explain to ME, what Agenda 21 was really about.
UM: Fair enough – I apologize for that.
MI: Accepted.
WSI: He’s like me – getting up to speed as it were. Please – continue.
MI: Yes sir.
(Pause)
Decades ago. The first official mark goes back to the early 1970’s. The birth of the modern environmental movement. Are you aware that the protection of the environment was placed as the most important issue – more than freedom, sovereignty of nations…environmentalism became the fixture of a full on assault against any nation’s own self determination.
Those who have spoken out against Agenda 21 – and there have been members of the military and intelligence communities who have…they understood the implications. These people are not conspiracy nuts. These people are patriots who understand the threat. The country – the United States, is under siege. It has been going on for a long time. Decades of planning. And now the planning stage is being transitioned into the implementation stage. Right now. It’s happening now.
WSI: And you are absolutely convinced of that? It’s happening now – the election of Barack Obama was the signal? Implementation of this globalization plan commenced at that time? Fully commenced? Right?
MI: Yes sir.
UM: How? (Pause) The…implementation? How does that work. By force? Using our own military against us?
MI: No. That would be too much of a risk…most of our military personnel are good men and women. They signed up. They took an oath. And they are doing their job. Remember, I indicated some inside the military were part of this globalization movement. Not all. Not most. But some.
UM: But some of these inside the military – they have influence?
MI: Yes. Appointed to positions of authority. By this administration.
UM: The Secretary of State? Panetta? I thought he was the real hero of the Bin Laden raid?

MI: He acted outside his direct authority. That action had little to nothing to do with the best interests of the United States.

UM: What do you mean?
MI: (Looks toward WSI)

UM: (Repeats question) What do you mean?
WSI: What they mean to say…if I may interject…is that Mr. Panetta’s motivations were…perhaps, a bit more… uncertain than many of us are comfortable admitting to. The fact he is a Clintonite means a great deal to –name deleted-. It means nothing to me. Nothing.
UM: So you don’t trust him?

WSI: No – I do not. I’ve never trusted any of them.
UM: Who?

WSI: Politicians. That’s much of my reason for never voting in an election. I find them all distasteful to some degree. Even the best of them.
UM: But you’re voting this time – in 2012.
WSI: That’s correct. While I find most politicians distasteful…I find the man calling himself Obama to be something else entirely.

UM: And what’s that?

WSI: Dangerous.
UM: So you’ve said – but getting back to the Agenda 21 thing…this whole globalization concept…it’s difficult to wrap my head around all of it without coming off…without sounding…
WSI: Crazy?
UM: Yeah – crazy
.
WSI: That’s how it’s intended. Do that which you intend, and if any oppose that which you intend…mock them into submission while continuing on with your work. Call it outlandish, crazy, ridiculous, preposterous, all the while – continue doing the very thing they accuse of.
These Obama people are quite good at that.
UM: So the globalization thing…the plan…Agenda 21…it’s not just a Democrat thing?

MI: Correct.
UM: Republicans have gone along with it too?
MI: Correct. Let me clarify that a bit. If that’s ok?
UM: Please do.
MI: The architects are embedded within the various liberal sub groups, all of which are under the umbrella of today’s Democratic Party. They have been the ones to push this agenda – THE AGENDA…for the past several decades. There are Republicans…there have been Republicans, sympathetic to the superficial aspects of the plan.

(Long pause)
UM: You lost me. I get the liberal groups…I will assume the unions, the environmental groups…they are all in on the globalization plan. I get that. What do you mean by the superficial aspects of the plan? The…that part of it that attracts some Republicans?
WSI: If I may?
MI: Yes sir.

WSI: This is where the big money comes into play. Take for example, General Electric. A huge corporation with multiple subsidiaries…it is itself, a working, breathing, functioning, ever-evolving manifestation of this globalization movement. Massive amounts of dollars are spent developing public relations campaigns that infest the very fabric of the public conscience. Movies, television, music, fashion, consumable goods…it all becomes part of the implementation plan. Global cooling becomes global warming becomes climate change becomes sustainable resources…each of those are reading from the very same script.
And so as these concepts grow in popularity among the public…politicians bend their own vision to those concepts. They may do so not knowing of course the true motivations of those who have invented said concepts, but nevertheless, they become tools of the plan. They become that all-important “bi-partisan” support of those plans.

UM: So what’s the purpose of all of it? The plan? Globalization? Why? What’s the end goal?

WSI: First, and for us at this very moment, most important – is the total and irreversible transformation of the United States. If that is achieved – as the man calling himself Obama and all those who support him and have placed him in the White House…if that is achieved, then we are looking at a true one-world government ruled by a small group of elite who will control all aspects of production, dissemination of resources, how you are born, how you live, and how and when you are to die. There is a group who believes they will have a seat at that table of power – Big Labor, particular globalized financial institutions, certain business entities, they all share in a belief that the individual is simply too dumb, too un-evolved, to have to suffer through life on their own. They want to be told what to do. What to think. How to live.
UM: (turning to MI) Do you agree with that – it’s really that far-reaching? That’s where President Obama wants to take America? Take the world?
MI: Yes. I know it.
UM: How?
MI: (Looks to WSI)
WSI: Go ahead.
MI: Approximately two years ago…not quite two years ago…I received information pertaining to an election contingency plan. For 2012. After the 2010 elections there were particular operatives…specific to the Obama administration and Democratic Party leadership…indicating an overwhelming need to secure a second term for President Obama. That document’s title was…(pauses)

WSI: He can be trusted – I give you my word. Please proceed
.
MI: That document’s title was “By Any Means Necessary”. It was unofficial – but we know it came directly from channels specific to the administration. We confirmed that.

UM: What channels? Who are you talking about?

MI: We believe it to have been authored by Mr. Sunstein. Reviewed and approved by Valerie Jarrett. Preparations for implementation are being done in part by Mr. Leo Gerard coordinating with…with high ranking officials within the Department of Justice, Homeland Security…and…the U.S. military.

UM: Leo Gerard? The union leader? How would he play a part in this?

WSI: Mr. Gerard has direct experience in toppling a government working directly with similar forces that would be in play here in the United States. You did some work on that…perhaps look more closely at what exactly happened in Brazil. It was a coup. An overthrow of government. A joint effort between Big Labor and certain business groups in which law enforcement helped facilitate the final push.
Brazil was a regime change orchestrated by Leo Gerard and soon after personally and financially congratulated by the President of the United States.
What is now being planned for the United States is not regime change – but the final implementation… and to use the words of the man calling himself Obama, the fundamental transformation of the United States of America that can only be assured by a second presidential term.
That plan to ensure a second Obama term as it has been titled, is to take place “By Any Means Necessary”.

Obama: “This Will Be My Last Political Campaign, No Matter What”…
…remember, that’s from a chronic, habitual, pathological, shameless LIAR !!!!

“If memory serves, Jacksonville is a predominantly military town and most military people despise this pretender…Most are actually hoping for his removal.”

I’m in Jacksonville. He made sure to have his speech within walking distance of the section 8 housing.

Term limited according to what ? The Constitution ?

You know he’s eyeballing SecGen of the U.N.. The United States is small potatoes, he wants the WORLD!

he’s hoping to foment an amendment repeal…

@ Uncle Buckeye – “You know he’s eyeballing SecGen of the U.N.. The United States is small potatoes, he wants the WORLD!”

BINGO! His problem, of course, is that the charter states, I believe, the Sec. Gen. cannot come from country with permanent seat on the Security Council.

Watch the skies – if they change the charter, that’s exactly what’s about to happen.

At which point, we kick U.N. out of N.Y. and Barrykins can go live in the Hague.

@Ty – good point – I think he would run again, if he could get nominated by the msdnc – who knows if they would let him even run again, since he’s done such a hell of a good job so far . . .

But I have as much faith in this statement as any of his previous statements and speeches . .

If he ran for UN Secgen, it would not surprise me at all . .his commie buddies on the Un council would find a way to circumvent any laws or regs which would prevent him from doing so. . . .

I know there are many Americans hoping his Presidency is term-inated quicker than not, perhaps with an Impeachment?!